WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 115

AN ACT PROHIBITING STATE AGENCIES FROM CHARGING SERVICE FEES FOR PAYMENTS MADE BY CERTAIN MEANS.

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Rob Sampson

Connecticut bill prohibits state agencies from charging service fees on citizen payments made by credit/debit cards and electronic methods, eliminating convenience surcharges on government transactions.

REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Finance, Revenue and Bonding
#creditcards #debitcards #fees #stateagencies
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 115

Legislative bill overview

SB 115 would prohibit Connecticut state agencies from charging service fees when citizens pay bills or fees using certain payment methods. The bill targets surcharges that agencies currently impose on transactions made through credit cards, debit cards, electronic transfers, or other specified payment mechanisms. This prevents state government from passing transaction costs directly to residents.

Why is this important

Many states and agencies charge convenience fees or processing fees when residents pay bills online or by card, effectively creating hidden costs for basic government services. These fees disproportionately affect lower-income residents who may lack alternative payment options and can add up significantly across multiple state agencies. The bill addresses whether essential government services should be accessible without additional financial barriers.

Potential points of contention

  • State revenue impact: Agencies currently use service fees to offset payment processing costs; removing them shifts those expenses to the general budget, requiring funds from other areas or raising overall taxes
  • Payment method equity: The bill may need clarification on which payment methods are covered—some argue all methods should be fee-free while others contend cash/check payments have no processing costs and shouldn't subsidize card users
  • Administrative burden: Determining which fees are prohibited versus legitimately passed through (e.g., wire transfer fees) could create implementation complexity and disputes between agencies and residents

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.