WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

S 672

An Act further protecting research animals

194th Legislature (2025-2026) Introduced by Peter Durant and 1 co-sponsor

S. 672 seeks to protect U.S. innovation and economic security from CCP influence.

Accompanied a study order, see S2687
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 672

Summary of S. 672 – Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025

Overview

S. 672, introduced in the U.S. Senate on February 20, 2025, is titled the Protect America’s Innovation and Economic Security from CCP Act of 2025. The bill’s full text and substantive provisions are not provided in the information available here. Based on the title, the measure is framed as addressing threats associated with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to the United States’ innovation capacity and economic security. The precise policy tools, scope, and mechanisms (e.g., regulatory changes, enforcement tools, or targeted restrictions) are not specified in the available material.

Status and Legislative Action

  • Introduced in Senate: February 20, 2025
  • Read twice and referred to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary: February 20, 2025
  • Status: Introduced in the Senate
  • Companion bill: HR 1468 (House of Representatives)

Sponsorship

  • Primary sponsor: Senator Rick Scott
  • Cosponsor: Senator Ashley Moody

Related Legislation

  • Companion bill in the House: HR 1468

Purpose and Scope (What can be inferred)

  • The bill’s title indicates a focus on safeguarding U.S. innovation and economic security from CCP influence or actions. The exact mechanisms, such as prohibitions, screening processes, investment restrictions, export controls, or penalties, are not included in the provided content. Therefore, the specific changes the bill would make, and the sectors or activities targeted, cannot be confirmed from the available information.

Potential Impacts (General considerations)

  • If enacted, such legislation could affect:
    • Technology and manufacturing sectors engaged in cross-border activity with China or CCP-linked entities.
    • Universities, research institutions, and companies involved in U.S.–China collaborations.
    • Investment, procurement, and supply chain activities deemed to involve national security concerns.
    • Federal agencies responsible for national security, innovation, and economic protection policy.

Note: The above potential impacts are general expectations often associated with legislation addressing national security, innovation, and economic security in relation to China; they are not details of S. 672 itself, which require the bill text to confirm.

Timeline and Next Steps

  • After introduction and referral to the Judiciary Committee, the bill would typically undergo committee review, potential hearings, and markup. If approved, it would proceed to floor consideration in the Senate, followed by reconciliation with House actions if applicable.
  • Stakeholders—businesses, universities, researchers, and national security advocates—would likely monitor committee actions, amendments, and any related hearings for changes to scope, definitions, penalties, and enforcement mechanisms.

If you can provide the bill text or specific provisions, I can deliver a detailed, point-by-point summary of the exact changes S. 672 would make.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.