WeVote

Bill

Bill

S 396

An Act for the end of Common Core, and establishing certain other curriculum standards

194th Legislature (2025-2026) Introduced by Jason Lewis

Stops government rewards or compensation for executives in the District, aiming to limit or alter executive pay practices.

Accompanied a study order, see S2792
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · S 396

Summary of S. 396 – Stop GREED Act of 2025

Overview

S. 396, titled the Stop GREED Act of 2025 (Stop Government Rewards Enriching Executives in the District Act of 2025), was introduced in the Senate on February 4, 2025. The bill’s text provided in the introduction consists solely of its short title; no substantive provisions are included in the version content supplied.

Purpose and Title

  • The introduced version designates the bill as the Stop Government Rewards Enriching Executives in the District Act of 2025, also known as the Stop GREED Act of 2025.
  • Based on the title alone, the bill appears to address government rewards or compensation for executives, specifically “in the District.” However, the actual legislative text outlining purpose, definitions, and specific prohibitions or requirements is not included in the information provided.

Legislative Actions (as introduced)

  • Introduced in the Senate on February 4, 2025.
  • Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs on the same day (February 4, 2025).
  • Status: Introduced; no further action listed in the provided material.

Sponsors

  • Primary sponsor: Senator Jerry Moran (R-KS)
  • Cosponsors: Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-TN)
  • Related to a companion bill: S. 423 (House companion not detailed in the provided information)

What is Known (Provisions and Impact)

  • Substantive provisions: Not provided in the excerpt. The text available is limited to the short title, so there is no detail on:
    • Specific prohibitions, restrictions, or regulatory changes
    • Target entities (federal agencies, departments, or specific programs)
    • Definitions, enforcement mechanisms, or penalties
    • Funding, fiscal impact, or effective dates
  • Potential impact: Without the full text, the bill’s concrete impact cannot be assessed. The title suggests a focus on limiting or altering government rewards or compensation for executives in the District, but the exact scope and mechanisms remain unknown.

Procedural Timeline and Next Steps

  • Next steps (if pursued): Committee consideration, potential hearings, amendments, and floor action in the Senate. If advanced, a companion in the House (S. 423) would progress in parallel through a separate chamber.
  • Timelines: As an introduced measure, it would typically move through committee markups before potential floor votes, subject to legislative priorities and political dynamics.

Notes

  • The information summarized here is based solely on the introduced text and the limited details provided (title, introduction date, sponsor information, and committee referral). For a complete understanding, the full bill text and any committee reports or amendments would be needed.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.