WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 6640

AN ACT EXPANDING THE BENEFITS PROVIDED TO THE DEPENDENTS OF FIREFIGHTERS WHOSE DEATHS ARE SUFFERED IN THE LINE OF DUTY.

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Al Paolillo

Connecticut bill expands financial support and benefits for families of firefighters killed in the line of duty, improving survivor assistance programs statewide.

REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Public Safety and Security
#deathbenefits #firefighters
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 6640

Legislative bill overview

HB 6640 expands the financial and support benefits available to families of firefighters who are killed while performing their duties. The bill modifies Connecticut's existing line-of-duty death benefits program to provide additional assistance to surviving dependents. Specific benefit expansions are not detailed in the bill title alone, but typically such legislation addresses survivor pensions, healthcare coverage, educational assistance, or other support mechanisms.

Why is this important

Firefighters face significant occupational hazards, and line-of-duty deaths create substantial financial hardship for surviving families who have lost their primary breadwinner. Enhanced benefits recognize this sacrifice and provide greater economic security during a critical period of grief and transition. This directly affects how well Connecticut supports families in its communities who have made the ultimate sacrifice in public service.

Potential points of contention

  • Fiscal impact and budget allocation: Expanded benefits increase state spending, raising questions about funding sources and whether these costs should come from general revenue, insurance pools, or dedicated firefighter benefit funds
  • Scope of coverage definitions: Determining which circumstances qualify as "line of duty" deaths (e.g., training accidents, cardiovascular events during shifts) may be contentious between unions, municipalities, and lawmakers
  • Equity across municipal systems: Connecticut has both municipal and career firefighters; debates may arise about whether benefits should be uniform or whether local agencies should absorb costs proportionally

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.