WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 6174

AN ACT ESTABLISHING A CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST THE STATE FOR INJURY OR ILLNESS CAUSED TO A STUDENT AS A RESULT OF VACCINATION OR MEDICINAL TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS.

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Mark Anderson and 8 co-sponsors

Bill creates state liability for student injuries from mandated vaccinations or medicinal treatments, allowing direct lawsuits against Connecticut rather than using existing compensation programs.

REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary
#damages #immunization #injuries #medicine #students
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 6174

Legislative bill overview

HB 6174 would create a legal right for students to sue the state of Connecticut if they suffer injury or illness resulting from vaccination or medicinal treatment requirements imposed by state policy. This effectively establishes state liability for adverse effects students claim to have experienced from mandated health interventions, with compensation available through the court system rather than existing no-fault injury programs.

Why is this important

This bill addresses a significant gap in legal recourse for individuals who believe they've been harmed by state-mandated medical requirements. Currently, vaccine manufacturers have broad legal immunity, and students harmed by state requirements have limited options. If passed, it could create meaningful financial consequences for the state and substantially increase litigation related to vaccination and medication mandates, potentially affecting future public health policies.

Potential points of contention

  • Causation burden and litigation costs: Establishing medical causation between a specific treatment and an injury is scientifically complex and expensive; this could generate extensive litigation with uncertain outcomes and unclear fiscal impact on the state budget.
  • Public health implications: Creating financial liability for vaccine/treatment mandates may discourage states from implementing disease prevention measures during outbreaks, potentially affecting herd immunity and disease control efforts.
  • Scope ambiguity: The bill doesn't specify which "medicinal treatment requirements" are covered, whether it applies retroactively, what standard of proof is required, or how it interacts with existing workers' compensation and vaccine injury compensation programs.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.