Below is a clear, objective summary of the materials you provided. The packet contains distinct measures that share the designation “SB 1092” but are from different states and address different subjects. I summarize each separately, then note procedural status and likely effects.
Summary — multiple SB 1092 measures in the packet
1) Arizona — “Vehicle mileage; tracking; tax; prohibitions” (Senate engrossed)
- Main purpose: Prohibit state and local governments from (a) adopting vehicle-miles-traveled (VMT) reduction goals in transportation/land‑use planning, (b) tracking individual motorists’ VMT, and (c) imposing mileage-based taxes or per-mile charges on individuals.
- Key provisions:
- Adds A.R.S. sections 1‑802, 1‑803, 1‑804.
- 1‑802: Bars consideration or establishment of VMT reduction goals/targets in transportation/land‑use planning or in project selection.
- 1‑803: Prohibits the state or political subdivisions from tracking or maintaining records of a person’s VMT by odometer readings, license‑plate capture, third‑party data, traffic cameras, or other means that reveal how many miles an individual has driven.
- 1‑804: Prohibits imposition or collection of mileage fees/taxes or any fee/tax based on vehicle miles traveled by an individual.
- Narrow exceptions in all three sections: interstate agreements for administering commercial vehicle fuel taxes/registration fees; motor vehicles owned/operated by the government entity itself.
- Who is affected: State agencies, cities/towns/counties/political subdivisions in Arizona; private motorists (prohibits certain government actions affecting their travel data and taxation); commercial interstate arrangements are preserved.
- Potential impact: Restricts use of VMT metrics in planning and blocks government-run mileage-based revenue mechanisms or mileage monitoring of individuals; could limit certain transportation demand‑management or road‑pricing options.
2) Hawaii — Transportation Demand Management (two versions: Introduced and SD1)
- Main purpose (Introduced): Require development and implementation of a comprehensive transportation demand management (TDM) program for state employees to reduce single‑occupancy vehicle commuting and associated emissions.
- Key provisions (Introduced version):
- DAGS and Dept. of Human Resources Development (DHRD) to establish and implement a TDM program; coordinate with Oahu MPO.
- Create two permanent 1.0 FTE co‑administrator positions (one at each department).
- Program duties: distribute education/outreach; have volunteer workplace transportation coordinators; offer fully subsidized transit and bikeshare passes integrating with employee badges; create a parking opt‑out program with a financial incentive.
- Appropriation: unspecified amounts for FY2025‑26 and FY2026‑27 for staffing, full pass subsidies, and parking opt‑out incentives.
- Effective date: July 1, 2025.
- SD1 changes:
- Focus shifted from immediate implementation to requiring DAGS and Department of Transportation to develop a plan for a comprehensive TDM program.
- Still requires coordination with Oahu MPO, workplace coordinators, transit/bikeshare integration, and parking opt‑out design.
- Two co‑administrator FTEs (one at DAGS, one at DOT) to oversee plan development.
- Requires a report with findings and recommendations (including proposed legislation) to the legislature no later than 20 days before the 2026 regular session.
- Appropriation retained for plan development (amounts unspecified). Effective date in the text is a placeholder (Jan 1, 2491).
- Who is affected: State of Hawaii executive departments, state employees in Hawaii (benefits, transit options), county transit agencies, Oahu MPO.
- Potential impact: If implemented, could increase transit usage among state employees via subsidies and parking opt‑out incentives and reduce commuter VMT; SD1 phases the work as a planning/reporting process first.
3) Illinois — Technical amendment to Clinical Psychologist Licensing Act
- Main purpose: Make a technical change to Section 1 of the Clinical Psychologist Licensing Act (225 ILCS 15/1) — text appears to reorganize or correct phrasing in the short‑title/policy section.
- Key provision: Amends the statutory wording that declares clinical psychology affects public health/safety/welfare and provides the Act’s short title.
- Who is affected: Licensed clinical psychologists and regulatory text — change appears stylistic/technical rather than substantive.
- Sponsor: Sen. John F. Curran.
- Potential impact: Minimal — a technical/clarifying amendment to existing statutory language.
Procedural status and notes
- The packet mixes materials from different states (Arizona, Hawaii, Illinois). Legislative actions listed in your document appear to reflect multiple jurisdictions and are not consistent for a single bill.
- The Bill Information at top (Title: REGULATION-TECH; Status: Rule 3‑9(a) / Re‑referred to Assignments; Introduced Feb 4, 2025) most closely matches the Illinois SB 1092 procedural cues (sponsor Curran; referral to Assignments), but the packet contains several unrelated SB 1092 measures. If you want a focused tracking summary or bill‑text analysis for one specific jurisdiction (Arizona, Hawaii, or Illinois), tell me which and I will prepare a jurisdiction‑specific, detailed summary (including likely fiscal impacts, affected statutes, and next legislative steps).
