WeVote
Log In

Bill

AB

Bill

SB 1536

AN ACT CONCERNING THE USE OF RANKED-CHOICE VOTING IN PARTY CAUCUSES, CONVENTIONS AND PRIMARIES, INCLUDING PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE PRIMARIES, AND IN CERTAIN MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS.

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Aundré Bumgardner and 11 co-sponsors

Connecticut bill establishes ranked-choice voting for primaries, caucuses, conventions, and select municipal elections, replacing single-choice ballots with preference rankings.

FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
#ballots #candidates #caucuses #municipalelections #politicalconventiondelegates #politicalparties #presidentialpreferenceprimaries #primaries #secretaryofthestate #voting #votingtabulators
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 1536

Legislative bill overview

SB 1536 would implement ranked-choice voting (RCV) in Connecticut's party caucuses, conventions, primaries, and certain municipal elections. Under this system, voters rank candidates by preference rather than selecting one, with votes redistributed based on rankings if no candidate achieves a majority in the first round.

Why is this important

RCV fundamentally changes how electoral winners are determined, potentially reducing the influence of plurality voting and third-party "spoiler" effects. This could impact candidate strategy, voter behavior, and election outcomes at multiple levels—from municipal races to presidential preference primaries.

Potential points of contention

  • Implementation complexity: RCV requires new voting equipment, voter education, and election administration training, creating significant logistical and financial costs for municipalities and parties
  • Party autonomy concerns: Mandating RCV in party caucuses and conventions may conflict with political parties' traditional control over their nominating processes
  • Voter confusion and participation: Some voters may find ranking preferences complicated, potentially leading to higher rates of ballot errors, exhausted ballots, or decreased participation in party processes
  • Unpredictable outcomes: RCV can produce counterintuitive results where a candidate's support in later rounds differs significantly from initial polling, potentially creating perception of legitimacy issues

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.