WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 256

An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in inheritance tax, further providing for transfers not subject to tax.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Mike Armanini and 10 co-sponsors

HB 256 repeals the ban on public-employee bargaining and applies Article 10's union rights to all state/local workers, enabling formal bargaining but raising costs and admin needs.

Referred to Finance
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 256

Summary — HB 256: Allow Public Employee Collective Bargaining

Status: Passed 1st Reading
Introduced: August 19, 2025
Subject areas: Employment; Organized labor; Public personnel; State and local government employees

Main purpose

HB 256 removes an existing statutory prohibition on public‑sector collective bargaining and makes the State’s existing collective‑bargaining framework (Article 10 of Chapter 95) applicable to public employees and all state and local government employers. In short, it opens the public workforce to the same statutory collective‑bargaining rights that currently apply to private‑sector employees under Article 10.

Key provisions

  • Repeals Article 12 of Chapter 95 of the General Statutes (the statutory prohibition on public employee collective bargaining).
  • Adds a new section, G.S. 95‑78.1, stating: “The provisions of this Article apply to all public employees and to all State and local government employers in this State.” (i.e., Article 10 will apply to public employment.)
  • Effective date: the act takes effect upon becoming law.

Note: HB 256 does not itself restate the substantive rules of collective bargaining — it incorporates the provisions of Article 10 by reference. The specific rights, procedures, and limitations (e.g., certification, bargainable subjects, unfair labor practices procedures, and any limitations on strikes) will be defined by Article 10 as it currently exists or is later amended.

Who would be affected

  • Public employees statewide: state agency staff, county and city employees, school district employees and other municipal or special‑district workers.
  • Public employers: all state and local government entities that employ public workers.
  • Labor organizations and unions seeking to organize and represent public employees.
  • Taxpayers and local/state budgets, since negotiated terms (wages, benefits, staffing levels) can affect public expenditures.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Labor relations: Public employees could form or join unions, seek representation, and pursue collective bargaining under the procedures of Article 10.
  • Fiscal effects: Negotiated increases in pay, benefits, or staffing levels could raise personnel costs for state and local governments; the bill does not include a fiscal note. Budgetary impacts will depend on what is negotiated and any statutory constraints on spending.
  • Administrative changes: Employers will need to implement certification, bargaining, and grievance‑handling processes; training and staffing in human resources and legal sections may be required.
  • Legal and policy questions: Conflicts may arise between collective‑bargaining outcomes and existing statutes, funding limits, or constitutional duties. The treatment of traditionally sensitive areas (e.g., public‑safety personnel, emergency operations, and strike prohibitions) will depend on Article 10’s provisions and any implementing practice or litigation.
  • Implementation logistics: Rules for bargaining units, timelines for certification, and transition procedures will require clarification by agencies, employers, and possibly by rulemaking or case law.

Procedural / timeline notes

  • The bill becomes effective when it becomes law.
  • Because the bill incorporates Article 10 rather than creating a new public‑sector regime, the precise rights and limits for public employees will track the language of Article 10 and any subsequent amendments or relevant court decisions.

Bottom line

HB 256 repeals the statutory ban on public‑sector collective bargaining and extends the State’s existing collective‑bargaining law (Article 10) to all public employees and public employers. The bill is a structural change that enables public employees to organize and bargain under the existing Article 10 framework; its fiscal and operational consequences will depend on how bargaining proceeds and what specific agreements are reached.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.