WeVote

Bill

Bill

SB 117

An Act amending the act of March 4, 1971 (P.L.6, No.2), known as the Tax Reform Code of 1971, in historic preservation incentive tax credit, further providing for definitions.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Dave Argall and 6 co-sponsors

SB 117 would change PERA COLA formulas (new rate or index), affecting retiree benefits and future contributions, with budget impacts for state/local governments; action postponed.

Referred to Finance
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 117

Below is a concise, objective summary of SB 117, titled “PERA COST‑OF‑LIVING ADJUSTMENTS,” based on the bill title and legislative status you provided. Note: no bill text or fiscal note for this specific PERA COLA measure was included in the materials you provided; therefore the summary describes the bill’s likely purpose, typical provisions found in PERA COLA proposals, expected impacts, and procedural implications. Where specifics are unknown I indicate that the detail was not available and recommend next steps.

Summary — SB 117: PERA COST‑OF‑LIVING ADJUSTMENTS
Status: Action postponed indefinitely
Introduced: January 23, 2025
Subject area: Officers & employees — public (public pension/COLA)

Purpose and intent
- The bill’s title indicates its primary purpose is to change how cost‑of‑living adjustments (COLAs) are provided under the Public Employees’ Retirement Association (PERA) system. Typically such legislation seeks to: (a) increase, decrease, or index COLA amounts for current and/or future retirees; (b) modify COLA eligibility or timing; or (c) authorize one‑time ad hoc adjustments.

Key provisions (typical elements in COLA legislation — actual provisions for this bill not available)
- Modify COLA rate or formula: change a fixed percentage or adopt an indexing method (e.g., tied to CPI‑U or chained CPI).
- Eligibility changes: adjust which retirees or survivor beneficiaries qualify (e.g., service or age thresholds, effective cohorts).
- Effective date and application: specify whether changes are prospective or retroactive and which benefit payments are affected.
- Funding mechanism: direct how the COLA increase will be financed — e.g., draw on PERA reserves, increase employer or employee contributions, transfer general fund dollars, or create an amortization schedule for unfunded liability.
- Protections or limits: include caps, phase‑in periods, or cost containment triggers if funding metrics fall below thresholds.
- Administrative direction: instructions for PERA board implementation, actuarial adjustments, or required reporting to the legislature.

Who would be affected
- Primary: PERA retirees and surviving beneficiaries (benefit levels and purchasing power).
- Secondary: Active public employees (future retirees may be affected by prospective changes), public employers and taxpayers (state and local governments that fund employer contributions), and PERA plan fiduciaries (board, actuaries).
- Fiscal actors: state budget offices and local government finance officers (depending on the funding approach).

Potential fiscal and policy impacts (depend on unspecified bill details)
- Short‑term: if COLA is increased or accelerated, near‑term pension expenditures or transfer needs may rise; one‑time payments may require short‑term appropriation.
- Long‑term: statutory increases that are not fully prefunded can increase PERA’s actuarial liabilities and employer contribution rates, shifting costs to state/local budgets or requiring contribution increases.
- Budget risk: without offsetting revenue or contribution increases, COLA changes can exert pressure on general fund or local tax levies.

Procedural / timeline aspects
- Current status: “action postponed indefinitely” generally means the committee deferred consideration and the bill is not advancing this session unless reactivated.
- Next steps to revive or change status: bill sponsor or committee could move to lift the postponement, amend, or reintroduce language in a future session; any funding provisions would typically require accompanying fiscal notes and actuarial analysis before passage.

Missing information / recommended next steps
- The actual bill text and fiscal note were not included in the materials you provided. To complete a definitive, factual summary:
- Obtain the full bill text and any committee analyses (actuarial and fiscal notes).
- Review PERA actuarial projections and the system’s current funded ratio and contribution schedule.
- Identify whether the bill proposes immediate appropriations, new contribution rates, or one‑time payments.
- If you want, I can:
- Draft a focused summary once you supply the bill text or fiscal note.
- Draft potential fiscal scenarios (low/medium/high cost) based on typical COLA structures for PERA.

If you’d like, provide the bill text or fiscal analysis and I’ll produce a detailed, specific summary (including estimated fiscal impact and affected cohorts).

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.