WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 1884

An Act amending the act of June 22, 1937 (P.L.1987, No.394), known as The Clean Streams Law, in general provisions and public policy, providing for general permit modernization.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Jake Banta and 15 co-sponsors

HB 1884 would require hand-counted ballots to have a watermark or UV seal and set strict 24-hour counting timelines with backup machine results if delays occur.

Referred to Environmental & Natural Resource Protection
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 1884

HB 1884 — Summary (2025)

Status: Died in House committee (Sine Die adjournment, 2025-05-05)
Primary sponsor: Rep. Long
Subject classification: Ways and Means

Note on source material: The provided text conflates multiple, inconsistent drafts and entries (including Arkansas election-law amendments and an unrelated Illinois appropriations provision). This summary focuses on the substantive Arkansas-language amendments contained in the HB 1884 draft you provided. Procedural dates below reflect the entries supplied; the bill ultimately died in committee.

Purpose

To amend state election law governing the form, security and hand-counting procedures for paper ballots. The draft emphasizes added ballot security features and stricter timing, staffing, and reporting requirements for hand counts.

Key provisions

  • Ballot security feature (Arkansas Code § 7-5-601(i)):

    • Each paper ballot to be hand-counted must include either a watermark or an ultraviolet (UV) ink seal.
    • The placement of the watermark or UV seal must be unique for each election cycle.

  • Hand-count timing and certification (Arkansas Code § 7-5-603(4)):

    • Poll workers must begin and continue counting immediately at poll close and complete the count within 24 hours of poll closing, with no significant interruptions.
    • A hand count must be completed a minimum of 24 hours before the certification deadline.
    • If the hand count is not completed at least 24 hours before certification, then machine-tabulated results (per subdivision (1)) become the certified election results.
    • If a poll worker is incapacitated, remaining workers must continue; county boards must ensure a minimum of four poll workers are available to continue counting.
    • All hand-count totals must be recorded by race in each precinct and posted at the hand-count location when counting is completed.

  • Security exemption for uninterrupted counting:

    • Poll workers may be exempted from continuing the count to completion if, while not being counted, paper ballots:
    • Remain sealed in a double-locking hard-shell ballot box; and
    • Are stored in a locked room guarded at all times by a sheriff’s deputy.

Who would be affected

  • County and local election officials (responsible for ballot design, procurement, staffing, and compliance).
  • Poll workers (minimum staffing requirements, counting responsibilities).
  • Sheriffs’ offices (duty to guard sealed ballots when exemption is invoked).
  • Voters (procedural changes could affect timing of results/certification and transparency).
  • Vendors supplying ballots or security inks/watermarks (new specifications).

Fiscal and operational impacts

  • Potential increased costs to produce watermarked or UV-sealed ballots and to implement unique placement by election cycle.
  • Staffing costs to ensure minimum of four poll workers and possibly to cover sheriff deputy guarding duties.
  • Operational risk: provision allowing machine-tabulated results to be certified if hand counts miss the 24-hour-before-certification threshold could affect contest outcomes and public confidence if hand counts are delayed.

Procedural / timeline notes

  • Introduced: January 16, 2025 (per provided entry).
  • Read/committee actions: multiple readings and referrals recorded in March 2025; ultimately listed as “Died in House Committee at Sine Die adjournment” on May 5, 2025.
  • Companion bills referenced: SB 820 and HB 107 (listed as companions in the provided materials).

Caveat

The provided packet also contains unrelated language (an Illinois appropriation for child-care grants) and a title referencing bonds for Hinds County road improvements. Those elements appear to be from different bills and are not consistent with the Arkansas election-law amendments summarized above.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.