WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 85

An Act amending the act of June 13, 1967 (P.L.31, No.21), known as the Human Services Code, in fiscal provisions relating to public assistance, providing for distribution of SNAP benefits.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Dave Argall and 3 co-sponsors

NC requires body-piercing practitioners to hold annual state permits, pass inspections, and follow sanitation rules; licensed doctors and PAs/NPs exempt within practice.

Referred to Health & Human Services
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 85

SB 85 — Regulate Body Piercing in North Carolina (2025)

Status: Passed 1st Reading (Introduced Jan 21, 2025)
Primary sponsor: Sen. Hanig

Main purpose

SB 85 creates a statutory regulatory framework for non-ear body piercing in North Carolina. It requires persons who perform body piercing to hold a state permit, establishes a one‑year permit/renewal cycle, and directs the North Carolina Commission for Public Health to adopt rules setting sanitation and other permit requirements.

Key provisions

  • New statutory home: adds a new Part 11A to Article 8 of Chapter 130A and creates G.S. 130A‑283.10 (Body piercing regulated).
  • Definitions: “Body piercing” is defined as piercing any part of the body other than the ears for insertion of jewelry, by needle or other methods. “Body piercing establishment” is any location where body piercing is conducted.
  • Permit requirement:
    • No person may engage in body piercing without first obtaining a body piercing permit from the Department of Health (Department).
    • Applications must be made on Department forms; the Department (through the local health department) inspects premises, instruments, utensils, equipment and procedures before issuing a permit.
    • Permits are valid for one year and must be renewed annually by application.
    • Permit must be posted conspicuously at the establishment.
  • Exemptions: Licensed physicians, and physician assistants and nurse practitioners when performing piercings within the normal course of their professional practice, are exempt from the Part’s permit requirements.
  • Department authority: The Department may deny applications, and may suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew permits for violations.
  • Appeals: Administrative enforcement and appeals are governed by Chapter 150B and G.S. 130A‑24(a) (the Administrative Procedure Act).
  • Criminal prosecution: Compliance with the new Part does not preclude prosecution under G.S. 14‑400 (an existing criminal statute referenced by the bill).
  • Rulemaking: G.S. 130A‑29(c) is amended to add (12), directing the Commission to adopt rules on obtaining/renewing permits and sanitation requirements for premises, utensils, equipment and procedures.

Who is affected

  • Primary: body‑piercing practitioners and body‑piercing establishments (excluding ear‑only piercings).
  • Local health departments: responsible for inspections and permit administration on behalf of the Department.
  • Medical practitioners (MD/DO, supervising PAs/NPs): explicitly exempt when piercings are within their professional practice.
  • Consumers: may see improved sanitation/consumer protection; possible changes in service availability and cost.

Enforcement, compliance & timeline

  • Enforcement mechanisms: permit denial/suspension/revocation; appeals through administrative process (150B).
  • Effective date: Section 1 (establishing the permit requirement) becomes effective when rules required under G.S. 130A‑29(c)(12) are adopted and become effective. The Codifier of Rules is to notify the Revisor of Statutes of the rule effective date. Other provisions take effect when the act becomes law.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Public health: the rulemaking mandate aims to standardize sanitation and reduce infection risks associated with piercing.
  • Regulatory burden: existing piercers will need to secure permits and comply with inspection and rule standards; small businesses may face compliance costs (application/inspection, possible facility upgrades), though the bill does not specify fees or training requirements — those details are left to the Commission’s rules.
  • Local implementation: local health departments will need to develop processes for inspections and permit issuance once rules are in place.
  • Legal interplay: exemption for licensed medical professionals narrows the law’s reach; the statute preserves the option for criminal prosecution under existing law where applicable.

For fuller text: the bill adds G.S. 130A‑283.10 and expands G.S. 130A‑29(c) (new subdivision (12)) to authorize rulemaking on permit and sanitation requirements.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.