WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 450

An Act amending the act of April 12, 1951 (P.L.90, No.21), known as the Liquor Code, in Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, providing for amnesty for disciplinary actions regarding COVID-19 protocols.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Jamie Barton and 13 co-sponsors

HB 450 bans warrantless electronic tracking by private investigators and requires warrants for wildlife inspections and nonpublic-area entries, boosting private-property privacy.

Referred to Liquor Control
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 450

Summary — HB 450: Private Property Rights Act (North Carolina, 2025)

Status & key dates
- Introduced (filed): November 12, 2024.
- Passed 1st Reading / referred to committees: March 18, 2025 (Judiciary 2; subsequently referred to Wildlife Resources and Rules as indicated in the history).
- Effective date (if enacted): December 1, 2025; applies to offenses committed on or after that date.

Purpose
- To strengthen private-property privacy protections by (1) prohibiting private detectives/private investigators from installing or using electronic tracking devices without a search warrant or other judicial order, and (2) requiring wildlife protectors (wildlife enforcement officers) to obtain a search warrant or similar judicial/administrative order before conducting certain inspections or searches of private property.

Major provisions
1. Ban on warrantless placement/use of electronic tracking devices by private investigators
- Repeals G.S. 14‑196.3(b)(5)k (the statutory provision being removed) and explicitly prohibits a private detective or private investigator from installing or using an electronic tracking device unless first authorized by a search warrant or other judicial order.

  1. Limits on wildlife protectors’ search authority (amendments to G.S. 113‑136)

    • Clarifies that protectors’ jurisdiction covers wildlife matters (boating, hunting, trapping, fishing, activities on inland waters, offenses on wildlife-managed lands).
    • Adds an explicit rule: searches of the curtilage of a dwelling or the living quarters of a vessel require a search warrant or other judicial order and must comply with constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
  2. Inspection and warrant procedures for licensed/commercial premises (amendments to G.S. 113‑302.1)

    • For premises subject to routine administrative control/inspection (e.g., commercial operations where wildlife possession/records are regulated), protectors may enter for reasonable inspections during appropriate hours (open for business or staff present).
    • For other nonpublic areas (e.g., refrigerated storage, meat shops, markets, hotels, restaurants) protectors must request permission to enter nonpublic areas; if permission is refused, the protector is authorized to obtain and execute an administrative search warrant under Article 4A of Chapter 15 (or successor law).
    • For inspections authorized under the statutory subsection covering regulated operations, obtaining an administrative search warrant may be done at the protector’s discretion or as case law requires.
    • The amendments preserve ability to conduct lawful searches under other warrant statutes (e.g., Chapter 15A) when circumstances justify.

Who is affected
- Private detectives and private investigators (prohibited from warrantless tracking device use).
- Property owners and residents (increased protections for dwellings and vessel living quarters).
- Businesses subject to wildlife-related inspections (food storage, meat shops, markets, restaurants, etc.) — may face a formal warrant process when entry to nonpublic areas is refused.
- Wildlife protectors (wildlife enforcement officers) and prosecuting/issuing authorities (magistrates/judges) — procedural changes and increased use of administrative search warrants.
- Courts — potential increase in warrant applications for investigative and inspection activities.

Potential impacts and considerations
- Privacy: strengthens Fourth Amendment–type protections on private property and curtilage and limits warrantless electronic surveillance by non‑law‑enforcement actors.
- Enforcement/administration: may require wildlife protectors to rely more often on administrative search warrants, potentially causing administrative workload and possible delays in time‑sensitive investigations. The bill retains routine inspection authority for open-business situations but creates a clearer pathway to a warrant when access is denied.
- Investigative practice: private investigators lose a warrant-exception tool (tracking devices) and must obtain judicial authorization before using such devices.

Text references
- Repeal: G.S. 14‑196.3(b)(5)k.
- Amendments: G.S. 113‑136 and G.S. 113‑302.1.
- Effective date provision: Sec. 3 — applies to offenses committed on or after December 1, 2025.

Sponsor(s)
- Primary sponsor listed: Representative Chesser (with Representative Miller, Pyrtle, Huneycutt among primary sponsors on the published edition).

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.