WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 6279

Allowing ultrasounds prior to terminating a pregnancy.

2023-2024 Regular Session Introduced by Phil Fortunato

SB 6279 would require ultrasounds before abortion in Washington, raising questions about informed consent standards and healthcare access equity.

First reading, referred to Health & Long Term Care.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 6279

Legislative bill overview

SB 6279 would require or allow ultrasounds to be performed prior to pregnancy termination in Washington state. The bill was introduced in January 2024 and referred to the Health & Long Term Care Committee but has not advanced further in the legislative process.

Why is this important

Ultrasound requirements before abortion are a significant policy flashpoint affecting reproductive healthcare access and medical decision-making. This issue directly impacts how abortion services are delivered, patient experiences, and the regulatory framework governing reproductive medicine in Washington.

Potential points of contention

  • Medical necessity vs. regulation: Disagreement over whether ultrasounds should be mandatory or optional, with supporters citing informed consent and opponents arguing ultrasounds are medically unnecessary for most terminations and add cost/delay
  • Informed consent standards: Different views on what constitutes adequate informed consent—whether viewing ultrasound images should be required, optional, or irrelevant to the consent process
  • Access and timing concerns: Questions about whether mandatory ultrasounds create barriers for patients seeking timely care, particularly those with limited resources or facing tight gestational windows

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.