WeVote

Bill

Bill

H 3104

Alimony

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Gil Gatch

For marriages of ten years or less, courts must base alimony on earnings without counting opportunities missed to be a spouse or parent.

Referred to Committee on Judiciary
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · H 3104

Summary — H 3104 (Alimony)

Purpose

H 3104 would amend South Carolina’s alimony statute to limit how courts calculate “reasonably anticipated earnings” for marriages of a specified, shorter duration. The change is intended to restrict consideration of lost career opportunities tied to spousal or parental roles when the marriage lasted ten years or less.

Key provision

  • Amends S.C. Code § 20‑3‑130(C)(6) (one of the statutory factors courts must consider when awarding alimony).
  • Current statutory language requires courts to consider “the current and reasonably anticipated earnings of both spouses.”
  • The bill adds a proviso: for marriages lasting ten years or less, “reasonably anticipated earnings” must be based on what each spouse could have earned without taking into consideration opportunities missed to be a spouse or parent.

Who is affected

  • Parties in divorce proceedings in South Carolina, especially spouses seeking or defending alimony in marriages of ten years or less.
  • Family court judges and other decision‑makers who apply § 20‑3‑130’s statutory factors when setting alimony.
  • Family law attorneys and expert witnesses who present evidence on earning capacity, work history, and caregiving-related career interruptions.

Practical effect and implications

  • For marriages ≤10 years, courts would no longer factor in reduced earning projections that arise from career interruptions specifically caused by choosing to be a spouse or parent. In practice, that may:
    • Reduce alimony awards (or duration) in cases where a claimant’s expected earnings were lowered by caregiving or spousal-role decisions during a short marriage.
    • Shift alimony analyses toward objectively measurable earnings potential absent caregiving-related lost opportunities.
    • Potentially disadvantage spouses (often women) who left or curtailed careers for family responsibilities even in marriages up to ten years.
  • For marriages longer than ten years, the current broader consideration of anticipated earnings (including effects of parenting/spousal roles) remains unchanged.

Procedural status & timeline (as provided)

  • Prefiled: 2024‑12‑05
  • Introduced/read first time: 2025‑01‑14; referred to Committee on Judiciary (also entry showing referral 2025‑02‑27 to Committee on Revenue — see note below)
  • Official introduction date listed: 2025‑02‑27
  • Hearing scheduled: 05/13/2025, 10:30 AM–1:00 PM, Room A‑1
  • Accompanied a study order: 2025‑11‑10 (H4708)
  • Bill takes effect upon approval by the Governor.

Notes and anomalies

  • The packet supplied includes unrelated legislative text (Massachusetts House Docket No. 3564 concerning assisted living and tax increment financing). The operative alimony language appears to be a South Carolina amendment dated 12/05/2024. There are conflicting committee/referral entries in the materials provided; the summary above focuses on the South Carolina alimony amendment language and the Judiciary committee path shown.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.