Bill
S 5729
Adds hazardous air quality events to the definition of disaster and requires local emergency plans to include air quality preparedness and response.
Date: Introduced February 28, 2025
Status and Legislative Path
- Referred to: Governmental Operations (as of latest actions)
- Primary sponsor: Pete Harckham
- Cosponsors: Samra Brouk, José M. Serrano, Christopher Ryan, Robert Rolison, Julia Salazar, Patricia Fahy
- Legislative actions:
- Feb 28, 2025: Referred to Veterans, Homeland Security and Military Affairs
- May 28–29, 2025: First and Second Reports filed; advanced through committees
- Jun 4, 2025: Advanced to third reading
- Jun 11, 2025: Passed Senate; delivered to Assembly; referred to Governmental Operations
- Related bills: Companion A 7036; prior-session S 7932
Bill Purpose and Core Idea
- The bill adds hazardous air quality events to the state’s definition of “disaster” and requires air quality emergency preparedness to be included in local comprehensive emergency management plans.
- In short, it strengthens the framework for recognizing and responding to severe air-quality incidents and ensures local plans address air-quality risks alongside other disasters.
Key Provisions (substantive changes)
- Definition expansion:
- Amends the state definition of “disaster” to explicitly include hazardous air quality events (e.g., severe pollution or smoke events) as disasters eligible for state and local emergency response and resources.
- Local planning requirements:
- Requires local governments to incorporate air quality emergency preparedness into their local comprehensive emergency management plans.
- Anticipated components (in line with typical emergency planning) may include monitoring and detection, public notification and guidance, protective actions (e.g., shelter-in-place or evacuation where appropriate), interagency coordination, and resilience-building measures related to air-quality crises.
- Coordination and response:
- By expanding the scope of disasters to include air quality events, state and local agencies could coordinate more explicitly on response, mutual aid, and resource deployment during air-quality emergencies.
Who Would Be Affected
- Local governments and their emergency management offices responsible for updating and implementing comprehensive emergency management plans.
- State agencies involved in public health, environmental protection, and emergency management.
- The general public and local businesses, particularly in areas prone to hazardous air quality events (e.g., wildfire seasons, industrial emissions, or pollution episodes).
Procedural and Timeline Aspects
- The bill has moved through the Senate with multiple readings, culminating in Senate passage on June 11, 2025.
- It was delivered to the Assembly on June 11, 2025 and referred to the Governmental Operations Committee.
- A companion bill exists in the Assembly (A 7036), indicating cross-chamber consideration; S 7932 is noted as a related/preceding version.
Potential Impacts and Considerations
- Local planning: Localities would need to review and potentially revise emergency management plans to include air quality components, which may entail planning, training, and coordination efforts.
- Resource and cost implications: Updates to plans and public communication protocols could involve administrative costs; potential alignment with existing health and environmental agency resources may mitigate overall impact.
- Policy alignment: Mirrors growing emphasis on environmental health within disaster preparedness and resilience planning.
Next Steps for Stakeholders
- Assembly review by Governmental Operations and potential floor consideration.
- Engagement with local governments to understand planning needs and implementation timelines.
- Monitoring of related bills (A 7036) for potential differences or amendments before final enactment.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
