WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 1835

Abuse of elderly and disabled adults; Protective Services for the Vulnerable Adults Act; definition; persons required to report; investigation and reporting; Oklahoma's Protection and Advocacy System; Nursing Home Care Act; liability; waivers; reports; effective date.

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Randy Grellner and 1 co-sponsor

DSS must ensure specialized training for caseworkers assisting youth aging out of foster care, with defined evaluation metrics and quarterly public reports.

Policy recommendation to the Judiciary and Public Safety Oversight committee; Do Pass, amended by committee substitute Civil Judiciary
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 1835

Summary — HB 1835

Title: Requires the department of social services to provide caseworkers with specialized training for persons aging out of the foster care system
Filed: Jan 14, 2025 (Prefiled, House)
Subject areas: Children & minors, family law, social services, state Department of Social Services

Main purpose

The bill amends the state foster care statute (replacement language for §210.112 in the provided text) to (1) codify policy principles for the foster care and child welfare system, and (2) require the Department of Social Services (DSS) to ensure that caseworkers who assist youth “aging out” of foster care receive specialized training. The department is directed to set the parameters for that training.

Key provisions and changes

  • Adds/rewrites §210.112 to state core policy principles for foster care, including safety, timely services, provider qualifications, use of least-restrictive care, and preference for community-based services.
  • Explicit training requirement: DSS shall ensure caseworkers assisting youth transitioning out of foster care receive specialized training; DSS establishes the training parameters.
  • Evaluation framework:
    • DSS must develop an evaluation tool (in consultation with a response & evaluation team and other stakeholders) that aligns with federal/state guidelines and includes metrics supporting best practices (e.g., frequency of face‑to‑face visits).
    • Data on evaluation metrics must be collected monthly and summarized in quarterly reports by county; reports are public.
    • Providers may propose alternative metrics for exceptional cases; the response & evaluation team reviews such proposals.
  • Response & evaluation team: the bill specifies membership (five DSS foster care staff, five regional contractor representatives rotated annually, two research/academic experts, one juvenile justice official, and one juvenile/family court judge) and directs the division to staff the team. The statute text includes an earlier implementation milestone (team to meet for the first time before Jan 1, 2021), which appears carried over from prior versions.
  • Contracting and provider standards:
    • DSS and related agencies will competitively contract with qualified public or nonprofit child services providers.
    • Providers must meet specified performance and capability criteria (range of services, demonstrated record within state consistent with federal standards).
    • The evaluation metrics may be used to inform future contract awards and potential incentive/reimbursement structures.
  • Quality assurance: periodic provider evaluations, field file reviews, and a technical-assistance system for underperforming providers.

Who is affected

  • Primary: DSS (responsible for developing/setting training parameters), foster care caseworkers, and youth aging out of foster care.
  • Secondary: Public and private foster care providers (subject to evaluation and contract standards), courts and juvenile justice partners participating on the evaluation team, and counties (quarterly county-level reporting).

Impact and implications

  • Intended benefits: improve caseworker capacity to support youth transitioning to adulthood (independent living, employment, housing), increase oversight and accountability of providers, and better measure outcomes.
  • Administrative effects: DSS will need to develop training curricula/parameters, expand data collection and reporting, staff and support the response & evaluation team, and incorporate evaluation metrics into contracting—this may require funding and operational resources.
  • Providers: may face additional reporting, evaluation, and contracting requirements; performance metrics could influence contract awards and reimbursements.

Procedural status (as provided)

  • Listed as Prefiled (House) and filed Jan 14, 2025. (The textual excerpt contains implementation dates and earlier procedural language that appear to be carried over from prior drafts or prior sessions; verify current effective dates and enactment history with the legislature for the final version.)

If you want, I can:
- Extract the specific training parameter language needed for administrative rulemaking; or
- Draft a plain‑language summary for foster youth and providers describing how the new training and evaluation processes will affect them.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.