WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SR 95

A RESOLUTION urging United States Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate and prosecute individuals implicated in criminal activities related to the Jeffrey Epstein files and recognizing the efforts of Kentucky's own Representative Thomas Massie in securing their public release.

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Shelley Frommeyer and 4 co-sponsors

Kentucky urges the U.S. Attorney General to prosecute individuals implicated in recently unsealed Epstein documents while recognizing Rep. Massie's role in their release.

to Senate Floor
#attorneygeneral #crimesandpunishments #federallawsandregulations
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SR 95

Legislative bill overview

SR 95 is a Kentucky state resolution that calls on the U.S. Attorney General to investigate and prosecute individuals named in the recently unsealed Jeffrey Epstein court documents, while also praising Representative Thomas Massie for his role in securing the public release of these files. As a resolution, this is a non-binding statement of legislative intent rather than law.

Why is this important

The Epstein files contain names of individuals allegedly connected to criminal activity, and this resolution seeks to direct federal law enforcement resources toward potential prosecutions based on that newly available information. It reflects ongoing public and political pressure to pursue accountability for crimes potentially detailed in the documents, while also serving as political recognition for Massie's advocacy efforts.

Potential points of contention

  • Judicial independence concerns: A state legislature directing the U.S. Attorney General on specific prosecutions may be viewed as inappropriate legislative pressure on the federal executive and judicial branches
  • Due process questions: The resolution implicitly assumes individuals named in documents are "implicated in criminal activities" without established legal findings, which could be seen as prejudicial
  • Political motivation: The resolution's dual purpose of pursuing prosecutions while praising a specific congressman raises questions about whether this is policy-driven or partisan positioning

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.