WeVote
Log In

Bill

NA

Bill

HR 75

A resolution to urge the United States House of Representatives to introduce and adopt articles of impeachment against President Donald J. Trump for the high crimes of repeatedly undermining the Constitution of the United States.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Noah Arbit and 10 co-sponsors

Michigan House urges the U.S. House to introduce and adopt articles of impeachment against President Trump for alleged constitutional violations; a nonbinding, symbolic plea.

referred to Committee on Government Operations
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 75

Summary — HR 75 (Resolution urging the U.S. House to introduce and adopt articles of impeachment against President Donald J. Trump)

Note: the file provided contains multiple unrelated “HR 75” documents from different states and jurisdictions. The summary below addresses the specific resolution described in your header and within the Michigan House text: a state-level resolution urging the U.S. House of Representatives to introduce and adopt articles of impeachment against President Donald J. Trump.

Main purpose and intent

  • To urge the United States House of Representatives to introduce and adopt articles of impeachment against President Donald J. Trump for “repeatedly undermining the Constitution of the United States.”
  • To call attention to particular federal executive actions the resolution characterizes as violations of constitutional limits and due-process rights.

Key provisions / language

  • Asserts that President Trump swore to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution” and has failed to do so.
  • Identifies alleged examples of executive misconduct in the immigration context:
    • The alleged unlawful detention and removal of Kilmar Armando Ábrego García and the federal government’s failure (per the resolution) to comply with a Supreme Court order to facilitate his return.
    • Efforts to deport Mahmoud Khalil on foreign-policy grounds despite no criminal charges related to immigration status.
    • Revocation or termination of visas for large numbers of international students (examples cited: University of Michigan, Michigan State University, Grand Valley State University).
    • Alleged statements by the President expressing interest in deporting U.S. citizens.
  • Links these immigration actions to broader concerns about undermining due process and threatening other constitutional rights (e.g., free speech and assembly).
  • Cites constitutional authority for impeachment (Article II, Section 4; Article I Sections 2 and 3).
  • Non-legislative directives:
    • Urges the U.S. House to introduce and adopt articles of impeachment.
    • Directs that copies of the state resolution be transmitted to the Speaker of the U.S. House and to the members of the Michigan congressional delegation.
    • Requests a personal response within one month from the Office of the Clerk of the U.S. House to the Speaker of the Michigan House and the Majority Leader of the Michigan Senate.

Who would be affected

  • Direct legal effect: none. This is a state House resolution that urges action by the federal House — it does not itself impeach, remove, or impose penalties on any federal official.
  • Political/advocacy effect: intended to pressure or persuade members of the U.S. House and signal the Michigan legislature’s position to constituents, federal lawmakers, and the public.
  • Named individuals and institutions: cites specific federal immigration cases and universities as factual examples within the resolution’s argument.

Procedural / timeline aspects

  • Classification: House resolution (non-binding, memorializing).
  • Status (as provided in header): referred to Committee on Government Operations (introduced August 25, 2025).
  • The resolution asks for a one-month turnaround for a formal response from the U.S. House Clerk once the resolution is received.

Sponsors and authorship

  • The Michigan text identifies the resolution as offered by Representatives Dylan Wegela, McKinney, Morgan, Pohutsky, Dievendorf, Wilson, Weiss, Rheingans, and MacDonell.
  • The materials include a longer sponsors list (various names across jurisdictions). Because the uploaded file includes multiple HR 75s, please consult the official Michigan House journal or legislative website for the final, authoritative sponsor/co-sponsor list.

Impact and implications

  • Symbolic/political: The resolution expresses the Michigan House’s formal call for federal impeachment proceedings and may be used to galvanize public discussion and pressure federal legislators.
  • Practical/legal: The resolution carries no force to compel the U.S. House to act; impeachment authority rests solely with the U.S. House of Representatives according to the U.S. Constitution.
  • Administrative: If transmitted to the U.S. House, it may prompt replies by the Speaker or Clerk as requested, but does not create federal obligations.

If you’d like, I can:
- Pull and summarize the other HR 75 texts included in your file (e.g., Hawaii child-welfare inquiry resolution, Illinois Lunar New Year recognition, Kentucky Testicular Cancer Awareness Month, Georgia memorial), or
- Verify sponsors and procedural history against the official Michigan legislative record.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.