A RESOLUTION laying before the House of Representatives Articles of Impeachment against Julie Muth Goodman, Circuit Judge for the 22nd Judicial Circuit consisting of Fayette County.

2026 Regular Session Introduced by John Blanton and 2 co-sponsors

HR 124 initiates impeachment by presenting Articles of Impeachment against Judge Julie Muth Goodman for consideration by Kentucky’s House, not removal itself.

received in Senate

#courts #circuit #judgesandcourtcommissioners #publicethics

Summary of HR 124 (Session 2026RS) – Kentucky

Purpose and intent

HR 124 is a resolution introduced in the Kentucky House of Representatives that lays before the House Articles of Impeachment against Julie Muth Goodman, who is identified as a Circuit Judge for the 22nd Judicial Circuit (Fayette County).

The resolution functions as a formal procedural step in the impeachment process, transferring the issue of impeachable conduct from allegations to a structured House action.

Key provisions and changes

The bill explicitly states its purpose: to present Articles of Impeachment against Judge Julie Muth Goodman.

It does not itself remove or suspend the judge; rather, it authorizes the impeachment process by presenting formal charges (Articles of Impeachment) to be considered by the House, consistent with Kentucky impeachment procedures.

The resolution would initiate or advance the constitutional process for impeachment within the Kentucky General Assembly.

Affected parties and entities

Primary: Julie Muth Goodman, Circuit Judge for the 22nd Judicial Circuit (Fayette County).

The Kentucky House of Representatives, particularly members serving on impeachment-related committees and, eventually, the full House, would be involved in deliberations on the Articles of Impeachment.

The judiciary and court operations within the Fayette County circuit may be indirectly affected during the impeachment proceedings and any resulting outcomes.

Procedural and timeline aspects

Chronology of actions:

2026-03-18: Introduced in the House and referred to the Committee on Committees (H).
2026-03-20: Placed in the Orders of the Day and adopted by the House in Committee on Committees with a vote of 73-14 (indicating preliminary support for moving forward).
2026-03-24: Received in the Senate (signifying delivery of the bill to the Senate for potential further action or concurrence, depending on legislative rules).

The actions indicate a multi-step process typical of impeachment resolutions:

Introduction and referral to appropriate committee.
Adoption or approval to proceed and place on the legislative calendar.
Transmission to the Senate (where a trial would occur if Articles are approved by the House) or further Senate action per Kentucky constitutional procedure.

Potential impact

If the House accepts and passes the Articles of Impeachment, the next constitutional steps would involve the Senate conducting a trial or trial-like proceedings to determine removal, discipline, or other consequences.

The resolution itself does not specify outcomes beyond initiation of impeachment proceedings; any ultimate removal or sanctions would depend on subsequent Senate action and verdict.

The proceedings could affect judicial operations in the 22nd Judicial Circuit during impeachment actions, though specifics would depend on timing and rulings related to temporary suspensions or duties.

Note: This summary is based on the text and procedural history provided. For a complete understanding, readers should review the full Articles of Impeachment language, the Kentucky Constitution’s impeachment provisions, and any subsequent Senate actions or floor amendments.