WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SJR 2003

A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Iowa relating to the right to reproductive care.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Tony Bisignano and 11 co-sponsors

Iowa SJR 2003 proposes a state constitutional amendment establishing a right to reproductive care, requiring legislative approval and voter ratification.

Subcommittee: Rozenboom, Drey, and Schultz.
#abortions #births #constitutionofiowa #contraception #freedoms #medicalcare #postpartumcare #pregnancy #prenatalcare #resolutions #resolutions-substantive #rights
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SJR 2003

Legislative bill overview

SJR 2003 proposes a constitutional amendment to Iowa's state constitution that would establish or protect a right to reproductive care. As a joint resolution, this bill seeks to initiate the formal amendment process, which requires legislative approval and typically voter ratification. The specific scope of "reproductive care" is not detailed in the available information.

Why is this important

Constitutional amendments carry the highest legal authority within a state and cannot be easily reversed by future legislatures. This proposal directly addresses reproductive rights at the state level—a significant issue following the 2022 U.S. Supreme Court decision eliminating federal constitutional protection for abortion. The outcome would substantially affect healthcare access and policy autonomy in Iowa.

Potential points of contention

  • Definition ambiguity: The resolution does not specify what "reproductive care" encompasses—whether it includes abortion access, contraception, fertility treatments, or other services—which affects both support and opposition
  • Amendment process burden: Constitutional amendments require multiple legislative votes and voter approval, making this a high-stakes approach compared to statutory legislation
  • Political polarization: Reproductive rights remain deeply divisive in Iowa and nationally, creating significant partisan conflict over whether such protections should exist at all

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.