WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SCR 4006

A concurrent resolution urging Congress to establish federal protections for the wild horse herd at Theodore Roosevelt National Park.

69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26) Introduced by Josh Boschee and 5 co-sponsors

North Dakota legislature urges Congress to establish federal protections for wild horses at Theodore Roosevelt National Park in response to herd management concerns.

Filed with Secretary Of State 04/01
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SCR 4006

Legislative bill overview

SCR 4006 is a concurrent resolution passed by the North Dakota legislature that formally urges the U.S. Congress to enact federal legislation establishing protective measures for the wild horse population at Theodore Roosevelt National Park. Concurrent resolutions express legislative intent but are not binding law—they serve as official requests to another governing body. This resolution specifically asks Congress to intervene in managing the horse herd at the North Dakota national park.

Why is this important

Wild horse management has become increasingly contentious on federal lands, with debate centered on ecological impact, animal welfare, and preservation of natural heritage. Theodore Roosevelt National Park's horse herd has grown substantially, raising concerns about overgrazing and habitat degradation, while horse advocates oppose culling or removal. This resolution signals North Dakota's legislative position that federal action is needed, potentially influencing congressional attention and policy discussions around national park management and wild horse conservation strategies.

Potential points of contention

  • Resource allocation vs. preservation: Managing horse populations requires resources; expanding protections may limit other park management priorities like native habitat restoration
  • Defining "protection": The resolution doesn't specify what federal protections should entail—whether limiting population size, preventing removal, or guaranteeing habitat—creating ambiguity about actual intent
  • Federal vs. state authority: Questions persist about whether national park management should prioritize local state legislative preferences or federal agencies' broader ecological mandates and scientific recommendations

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.