WeVote

Bill

Bill

SCR 4015

A concurrent resolution to amend and reenact section 2 of article V of the Constitution of North Dakota, relating to the election of public service commissioners; to provide for application; and to provide an effective date.

69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26) Introduced by Jeff Magrum and 2 co-sponsors

North Dakota bill to amend constitution's Public Service Commissioner election process failed in legislature; would have altered utility regulator selection method.

Second reading, failed to adopt yeas 9 nays 38
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SCR 4015

Legislative bill overview

SCR 4015 proposes to amend North Dakota's constitution to change how Public Service Commissioners are elected. The bill would modify Article V, Section 2 of the state constitution, though the specific electoral mechanism change is not detailed in the provided information. This is a constitutional amendment resolution that requires legislative approval before potentially going to voters.

Why is this important

Public Service Commissioners regulate North Dakota's utility companies, affecting energy rates and service standards for residential and business customers. Constitutional changes to their election process could shift the balance of power between legislative appointment, statewide elections, or district-based elections, fundamentally altering commission accountability and independence. The outcome directly impacts utility regulation and consumer protection in the state.

Potential points of contention

  • Voter vs. legislative control: Changes to commissioner selection method may redistribute power between elected officials and the general electorate, creating disagreement over democratic accountability
  • Regulatory independence: Modifications to election processes could affect whether commissioners prioritize utility company interests versus consumer protection, depending on the specific change proposed
  • Implementation complexity: Constitutional amendments require not only legislative passage but potentially voter approval, creating uncertainty about actual implementation timelines

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.