WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HF 3338

Wright County; intersection improvements along Trunk Highway 24 funding provided, bonds issued, and money appropriated.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Joe McDonald

Funds and finances a targeted TH 24 intersection improvement program in Wright County using state funding, bonds, and appropriations to upgrade safety and efficiency.

Introduction and first reading, referred to Transportation Finance and Policy
#bonds #counties-specific #highways #roads #andbridges
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 3338

Summary of HF 3338 (2025-2026) – Minnesota: Wright County; Intersection Improvements along Trunk Highway 24

Purpose and Intent

HF 3338 proposes targeted funding and financing to support intersection improvements along Trunk Highway (TH) 24 in Wright County. The measure aims to enhance traffic safety, improve vehicle efficiency, and reduce congestion at specified intersections through a combination of state funding, debt issuance (bonds), and appropriations. The bill is sponsored by a state representative with a co-sponsor noted as Joe McDonald, and was introduced and referred to the Transportation Finance and Policy committee on May 18, 2025.

Key Provisions and Changes

  • Funding Authorization and Allocation

    • Establishes a funding framework dedicated to intersection improvement projects along TH 24 within Wright County.
    • Allocates state financial resources (specific dollar amounts to be determined in the bill or future amendments) to design, right-of-way acquisition, construction, and related project costs for identified intersections along TH 24.

  • Bond Issuance

    • Authorizes the issuance of bonds (likely state bonds) intended to finance all or part of the TH 24 intersection improvement projects.
    • Includes repayment provisions, terms, and conditions aligned with Minnesota bonding practices and debt management policies (details such as interest rate, maturity, and source of repayment to be specified in the bill or accompanying fiscal notes).

  • Appropriations

    • Provides money appropriations to support the planning, design, construction, and potential ancillary activities (e.g., traffic signal upgrades, signage, drainage improvements, and safety enhancements) associated with the TH 24 intersections in Wright County.
    • May specify appropriations to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) or local partners for project delivery.

  • Project Scope (Intersections on TH 24)

    • Identifies or references specific intersections along TH 24 in Wright County to receive improvements. The bill likely outlines the scope such as:
    • Signal modernization or installation
    • Turn lane additions or modifications
    • Intersection widening or reconfiguration
    • Pedestrian and bicycle accommodations where applicable
    • Improved drainage and safety features (e.g., illumination, guardrails)

  • Project Delivery and Oversight

    • Establishes oversight mechanisms, potential project milestones, and reporting requirements to the Legislature or committee of jurisdiction (Transportation Finance and Policy).
    • May specify adherence to state procurement and environmental review processes.

Who/What Would Be Affected

  • Geographic Focus: Wright County, Minnesota, specifically the TH 24 corridor where targeted intersections are located.
  • Entities Involved:
    • Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) as the primary implementer and project manager.
    • Potential engagement with local entities, counties, or towns for right-of-way, alignment with local transportation plans.
  • Public Outcomes:
    • Improved traffic safety and efficiency at selected TH 24 intersections.
    • Potential temporary construction impacts during project delivery (detours, lane closures).
    • Long-term benefits include reduced crash risk, smoother commutes, and enhanced multimodal access.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction and Referral: Introduced and read for the first time on May 18, 2025, and referred to the Transportation Finance and Policy committee.
  • Next Steps (typical):
    • Committee review, hearings, and amendments.
    • Fiscal analysis and bond issuance specifics (rates, terms) typically addressed in fiscal notes.
    • Potential floor action and Senate counterpart considerations (if applicable) and final conference committee steps.

Notes

  • The bill’s language will specify exact dollar amounts, bond terms, eligible project costs, and the precise list of intersections addressed along TH 24.
  • As of the provided action history, the bill is in early stages of the legislative process.

If you’d like, I can add a section with potential fiscal impact estimates or compare HF 3338 to prior related transportation bond or appropriation bills for context.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.