WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 155

USE OF CERTAIN PROPER NAMES BY STATE

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Craig Brandt

SB 155 restricts state use of unspecified proper names; referral to three committees suggests constitutional or regulatory implications requiring further bill details for full impact assessment.

action postponed indefinitely
#stateagencies&departments(includingreorganization)
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 155

Legislative bill overview

SB 155 restricts state government use of certain proper names, though the bill text provided does not specify which names are restricted or the scope of the restriction. The bill has been referred to three Senate committees: Committees, Health and Public Affairs, and Judiciary, suggesting it may involve constitutional, regulatory, or public health considerations.

Why is this important

State naming conventions affect official documents, records, legal proceedings, and how government agencies identify people and places. Restrictions on proper name usage could impact how individuals are recognized in official contexts, potentially affecting civil rights, medical records, legal documentation, or cultural representation depending on the bill's actual provisions.

Potential points of contention

  • Lack of specificity: Without knowing which proper names are restricted, it's unclear whether this affects personal names, geographic designations, or organizational titles, making assessment of its actual impact difficult
  • Constitutional implications: Restrictions on name usage could raise First Amendment or due process concerns, depending on scope and application
  • Practical implementation: State agencies may face compliance challenges if the restriction is broad or affects existing naming conventions, records systems, or legal procedures without clear guidance

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.