WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HCR 5015

Urging the United States department of education to distribute certain federal moneys in the form of block grants to the state.

2025-2026 Regular Session

A Missouri House Concurrent Resolution urging the U.S. DOE to allot certain federal education funds to Missouri as block grants to boost state flexibility.

Died in Committee
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HCR 5015

Summary of HCR 5015 (Missouri-style example; adapt as needed)

Overview

HCR 5015 is a House Concurrent Resolution introduced on March 19, 2025, and referred the next day to the Committee of the Whole. As a concurrent resolution, it expresses the legislature’s official position and is directed to the United States Department of Education (DOE). It urges DOE to change how federal education funds are distributed by using block grants to the state.

Purpose and Intent

  • Primary purpose: Urge the U.S. Department of Education to distribute certain federal education funds to the state in the form of block grants.
  • Policy goal (as stated in title): Increase state-level flexibility in the use of federal education dollars by consolidating funds into block grants rather than separately targeted programs.

Key Provisions

  • The bill states the legislature’s desire that specific federal education funds be allocated to the state as block grants rather than as separately earmarked or categorical funds.
  • It directs the DOE to adopt or consider a block-grant structure for the referenced federal moneys (the exact funds and parameters would be defined in the bill’s text).
  • As a concurrent resolution, it serves as a formal recommendation or message from the Legislature to the federal DOE rather than creating or altering state law.

Affected Parties and Impacts

  • State government: The state would be promoting a shift in federal funding administration toward block grants, potentially increasing state discretion over how funds are spent.
  • United States Department of Education: The DOE would be the agency targeted by the resolution to modify its funding distribution approach.
  • Local education agencies and schools: Depending on the DOE’s response, flexibility could improve or complicate local planning, compliance, and reporting requirements. Enhanced local flexibility could lead to different programmatic outcomes or oversight needs.
  • Students and taxpayers: Indirectly affected through how federal funds are deployed for education programs, with potential changes to program emphasis, accountability, and services.

Procedural Status and Timeline

  • Introduced: March 19, 2025.
  • Referred to Committee of the Whole: March 20, 2025.
  • Next steps (generally): If advanced by the committee, the resolution would move to the floor for debate and potential passage by both legislative chambers. As a concurrent resolution, it would typically be presented to the Governor depending on state rules, though such resolutions do not, by themselves, enact law.

Notes

  • The resolution expresses a position to the federal DOE and does not create new state statutes or funding authority.
  • Specifics about which “certain federal moneys” are encompassed and the exact block-grant framework would be determined by the bill’s full text.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.