Bill
SB 1540
Allow agencies to set their own formats and processes for electronic records/signatures, with SOS and DoIT only issuing optional minimum standards.
Status
- Introduced in early 2025; currently listed as referred to Assignments (see filing date in February 2025).
- Principal sponsor listed: Sen. Ram Villivalam (other sponsors listed in the file: Bettencourt; Richards).
Purpose / Intent
- To change who sets technical and procedural requirements for governmental agencies’ use of electronic records and electronic signatures under the Illinois Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA). The bill shifts primary authority from statewide central rulemakers to individual governmental agencies while preserving a role for the Secretary of State and the Department of Innovation and Technology (DoIT) to adopt minimum standards.
Key provisions
- Amends Section 18 of the UETA (815 ILCS 333/18) concerning acceptance and distribution of electronic records and signatures by state governmental agencies.
- Current framework (prior to amendment): the Secretary of State and DoIT were required to adopt administrative rules (within a statutory timeline) specifying formats, attributes, and processes for electronic records and signatures used by agencies.
- Change made by SB 1540:
- Where a governmental agency elects to use/accept electronic records or electronic signatures, the agency itself may specify the required formats, attributes and the specific processes and procedures governing their use (giving due consideration to security).
- The Secretary of State and DoIT are authorized (but not required) to adopt rules that set forth minimum requirements. Any rules they adopt apply only within their respective domains: Secretary of State rules apply only to the Secretary of State; DoIT rules apply only to DoIT “client agencies” (as defined in the DoIT Act).
- Preserves the general UETA principle that agencies are not required to use electronic records/signatures.
Who is affected
- State and local governmental agencies in Illinois that choose to accept or issue electronic records/signatures.
- Businesses and members of the public who file records or do transactions with agencies (e.g., licensing, filings, permits).
- DoIT and the Secretary of State (retain authority to issue minimum standards for their scopes).
Potential impacts and considerations
- Increased agency-level flexibility: agencies can tailor formats and processes to their operational needs, potentially speeding adoption and innovation.
- Risk of fragmentation: disparate technical formats, signature types, or processes across agencies could create interoperability, compliance, and user-experience challenges for multi-agency filers or third-party software providers.
- Security and consistency concerns: decentralization may lead to varying security controls; DoIT/Secretary of State minimum rules could mitigate but apply narrowly.
- Administrative burden: private-sector filers and technology vendors may need to support multiple agency-specific requirements unless common standards are voluntarily adopted.
Statutory reference
- Amends 815 ILCS 333/18 (Uniform Electronic Transactions Act — Acceptance and distribution of electronic records by governmental agencies).
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.
