WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

AB 897

Trespassing: removal of trespassers on residential property.

2025-2026 Regular Session Introduced by Carl DeMaio

Failed California bill would have simplified procedures for removing trespassers from residential property, raising concerns about property rights versus due process protections.

From committee: Without further action pursuant to Joint Rule 62(a).
#trespassing #removaloftrespassersonresidentialproperty
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · AB 897

Legislative bill overview

AB 897 sought to modify California's trespassing laws to streamline the removal of trespassers from residential property. The bill would have altered the legal procedures and standards property owners must follow when removing individuals from their homes or residential land. The measure failed to advance past committee in its 2025 legislative session.

Why is this important

Trespassing disputes directly affect homeowners' ability to control access to their property and maintain security. Changes to removal procedures could significantly impact both property rights and the legal protections afforded to individuals on residential premises. The outcome influences how California balances homeowner authority with due process considerations.

Potential points of contention

  • Property rights vs. due process: Streamlining removal procedures may conflict with legal protections ensuring individuals aren't wrongfully denied access or shelter, particularly affecting vulnerable populations
  • Enforcement burden and clarity: Changes to removal standards could create ambiguity about what constitutes lawful removal versus illegal eviction or assault
  • Homelessness and housing crisis context: Modifications to trespassing law intersect with California's homelessness challenges, raising concerns about criminalizing poverty versus enabling property protection

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.