WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 1284

Traffic Safety - As introduced, requires the driver of a vehicle approaching a slow-moving or stationary farm tractor or implement of husbandry that displays an indicator that it is a slow-moving vehicle to reduce speed and move over, if possible to do so safely. - Amends TCA Title 55.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Timothy Hill

Requires PERS health plan to cover medically necessary fertility preservation services for those at risk of fertility impairment, with four cycles and broad parity.

Taken off notice for cal in s/c Transportation Subcommittee of Transportation Committee
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 1284

HB 1284 — Summary (North Dakota, 69th Legislative Assembly)

Status: Second reading — failed to pass (yeas 39, nays 48). Introduced: Nov 13, 2024. Sponsor(s): House members Brandenburg, Grueneich, Hanson, Satrom, Schauer, Schneider, Warrey; Senate sponsors Erbele, Hogan (committee engrossment). Act would have added a new section to NDCC ch. 54‑52.1 (public employee health benefits).

Purpose
- Require the public employees retirement system (PERS) health plan (the board’s plan under ch. 54‑52.1) to cover medically‑recommended fertility‑preservation services for covered individuals who have a medical or genetic condition — or who are expected to undergo medical treatment — that may impair fertility. Establish a temporary statutory pilot and require PERS to report back to the legislature.

Key provisions
- Definitions: “Medically necessary” tied to a licensed physician’s findings and to accepted standards (e.g., American Society for Reproductive Medicine, American Society of Clinical Oncology); “standard fertility preservation services” defined to include consultation, evaluation, testing, medications, treatments, and cryopreservation of eggs, sperm, embryos, or other reproductive tissue consistent with professional guidelines.
- Mandatory coverage: If a covered individual has a diagnosed condition (or will undergo treatment) that may impair fertility, the board must provide coverage for standard fertility preservation services when recommended and medically necessary.
- Scope of covered services: Must include consultation, evaluation, laboratory assessment, medication, procurement and storage of gametes/embryos/reproductive tissue, and all procedures required for cryopreservation.
- Number of cycles: Coverage limited to four preservation cycles.
- Parity and access: Coverage must be available to all covered individuals (including those entering coverage during special/open enrollment). Benefits may not be subject to restrictions (copayment, deductible, coinsurance, benefit maximum, waiting period, or other limits) that differ from other medical or surgical benefits under the plan.
- Exclusion: The section would not apply to Medicare Part D prescription drug coverage.
- Reporting / sunset: PERS must prepare and submit a bill to the 70th Legislative Assembly seeking repeal of the act’s expiration and to extend the mandate to all group and individual policies; the submission must include a report on the effect to system programs, utilization/costs, and a recommendation on continuation.
- Application and expiration: Applies to health benefits beginning after June 30, 2025, and the Act would expire June 30, 2027 (i.e., a two‑year window unless extended).

Who would be affected
- Primary: Public employees and other individuals enrolled in PERS group health plans and their covered dependents (any “covered individual” under the plan) in North Dakota.
- Secondary: PERS (administrators), plan providers, and ultimately state employer costs and budgetary exposure to utilization/costs for fertility preservation.

Procedural / timeline notes
- The bill established a temporary (through June 30, 2027) mandate and required PERS to produce a follow‑up bill and cost/utilization report to the next legislature.
- Legislative outcome: Failed on second reading (yeas 39, nays 48) and therefore did not become law during this session.

Potential fiscal/operational impacts (from bill text and requirements)
- The bill directed PERS to analyze and report utilization and cost impacts; actual cost implications were not specified in the bill text. If enacted, the coverage mandate could increase plan expenditures depending on utilization; administrative changes would be required to implement benefit terms and claims processing.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.