WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 1883

Traffic Safety - As introduced, enacts the "Super Speeder Accountability Act," which requires intelligent speed assistance devices to be installed on motor vehicles operated by persons convicted of certain driving offenses where speed was a factor; creates a licensing system for device providers; requires compliance-based device removal; authorizes indigent users to apply for assistance from the electronic monitoring indigency fund; makes other revisions. - Amends TCA Title 55.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Tim Rudd

Tennessee bill mandates speed-limiting devices on vehicles of convicted speeding offenders, with assistance available for low-income drivers unable to afford installation costs.

Failed for lack of motion in: Transportation Subcommittee
#trafficsafety
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 1883

Legislative bill overview

HB 1883 mandates installation of intelligent speed assistance (ISA) devices on vehicles operated by drivers convicted of speed-related offenses. The bill establishes a licensing system for device providers and allows device removal upon demonstrated compliance. It also creates a financial assistance pathway through an electronic monitoring indigency fund for low-income offenders unable to afford the technology.

Why is this important

Speed-related violations contribute significantly to traffic fatalities and injuries. This bill represents a technological enforcement approach that could reduce repeat offenses by certain high-risk drivers while raising questions about surveillance, privacy, rehabilitation effectiveness, and equitable implementation across socioeconomic groups.

Potential points of contention

  • Privacy and surveillance concerns: Continuous speed monitoring via installed devices raises questions about driver privacy, data storage, and whether this constitutes excessive government monitoring compared to traditional penalties
  • Cost and equity issues: Installation and maintenance costs may be prohibitive for low-income drivers; effectiveness of the indigency fund assistance is unclear, potentially creating a two-tiered system where poor drivers face additional financial burdens
  • Rehabilitation vs. punishment philosophy: Questions whether technological restrictions address root causes of reckless driving or simply impose technical restraints without behavioral change, and whether this approach is more or less effective than existing license suspension/revocation tools

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.