WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 9773

Permanent Trump Secure Border Act

119th Congress Introduced by Chip Roy

The bill aims to strengthen U.S. border security and immigration enforcement, expanding measures at the border and related agencies.

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 9773

Overview

HR 9773, introduced in the 119th Congress and co-sponsored by Rep. Chip Roy, appears to address border security and related governance. The bill has moved through the House Judiciary Committee and the House Foreign Affairs Committee, with a markup and an order to report in the nature of a substitute. The available action history indicates procedural steps toward passage, including referral to committees and a subsequent mark-up session.

Note: The provided information does not include the full text of the bill or specific statutory language. The summary below focuses on the stated purpose, procedural posture, and likely areas of impact based on the bill’s title and committee actions.

Purpose and Intent

  • To secure the borders of the United States and for other purposes.
  • Based on the title, the bill aims to strengthen immigration and border enforcement measures, with potential enhancements to border control, asylum processing, and related enforcement tools.

Key Provisions and Potential Changes (inferred from title and typical border-security bills)

  • Border Security Enhancements: Provisions likely to increase physical and operational measures at U.S. borders (e.g., expanded fencing or technology, deployment of personnel and resources).
  • Immigration Enforcement Tools: Potential changes to interior enforcement authority, detention standards, expedited screening, and removal processes.
  • Asylum and Refugee Procedures: Possible reforms to asylum admissibility determinations, expedited processing, or eligibility criteria.
  • Agency Roles: Alignment or expansion of authorities for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Justice (DOJ), and related border and immigration agencies.
  • Funding and Resources: Provisions for funding or reallocation of resources to border security initiatives.
  • Governance and Oversight: Increased reporting, accountability measures, or sunset/renewal provisions to ensure oversight of border security programs.
  • Miscellaneous Provisions: Depending on the bill’s text, there may be provisions on visa processing, entry-exit procedures, or cooperation with neighboring countries.

Who Would Be Affected

  • Unauthorized entrants and individuals seeking asylum or other protections would be directly impacted by changes to admissibility, screening, detention, and removal processes.
  • U.S. federal agencies responsible for border security, immigration enforcement, and asylum processing (primarily DHS and DOJ) would implement and administer the provisions.
  • State and local jurisdictions involved in immigration enforcement and service delivery could experience indirect effects through changes in enforcement priorities and cooperation with federal agencies.
  • Employers and industries affected by border and work-authorization policies may observe shifts in visa processing or entry controls.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Introduction: The bill was introduced in the House.
  • Referrals: Referred to the Judiciary Committee and the Foreign Affairs Committee for jurisdictional review.
  • Consideration: A Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session was held on July 21, 2026.
  • Reporting: The bill was ordered to be reported in the nature of a substitute by a vote of 16 Yeas to 14 Nays on July 21, 2026, indicating a close partisan split and the potential for a substitute amendment being considered during markup.
  • Next Steps: If reported, the bill would proceed to floor consideration, potential further amendments, and voting. The exact timeline depends on House leadership decisions and subsequent legislative calendars.

Important Notes

  • Detailed analysis of exact statutory changes requires the full bill text, including any substitute or amendment language. The summary above reflects the bill’s stated purpose and the typical scope of border-security legislation as inferred from the title and committee actions.
  • For a precise assessment of fiscal impact, regulatory changes, and compliance requirements, the bill’s sections, definitions, and enacted provisions should be reviewed.

If you’d like, I can search for the full text of HR 9773 and provide a line-by-line breakdown of each section and its concrete effects.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.