WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 10170

To require the Secretary of Commerce to conduct a study on the marketplace for advanced memory technology, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced by Mariannette Miller-Meeks and 1 co-sponsor

The bill would require the Secretary of Commerce to conduct a formal study of the advanced memory technology market to inform U.S. policy and competitiveness.

Introduced in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 10170

Bill overview

HR 10170, introduced in the 119th Congress, would require the Secretary of Commerce to conduct a study on the marketplace for advanced memory technology. The bill is currently referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. It has two co-sponsors: Darren Soto and Mariannette Miller-Meeks.

Purpose and intent

  • Primary aim: Commission a formal study by the Secretary of Commerce to examine the current state, dynamics, and outlook of the marketplace for advanced memory technology.
  • The study is intended to inform policies or actions by the federal government related to memory technologies, supply chains, and competitiveness.

Key provisions and changes

  • Mandate: The Secretary of Commerce must conduct a study focusing on advanced memory technology markets. The bill text (as summarized) does not specify additional codified authorities beyond requiring the study; it does not, in this summary, outline grant programs, regulatory changes, or new agency duties beyond the study requirement.
  • Scope of study (anticipated areas to be covered, based on typical statutory studies of this kind): market characterization of advanced memory technologies (e.g., DRAM, NAND, non-volatile memory, next-generation memory technologies), supply chain resilience, dominant-market players, domestic production capacity, R&D ecosystems, international competition, potential national security considerations, and policy options to strengthen U.S. competitiveness. Note: the exact scope would be defined in the bill’s text or accompanying committee report.
  • Deliverables: The bill would require the Secretary to prepare and presumably submit a final report detailing findings and recommendations, though the precise format, timeline, and dissemination requirements would be specified in the statutory text.

Who and what would be affected

  • Federal level: The Department of Commerce, particularly the Secretary and relevant bureaus functioning under the department.
  • Industries affected: Advanced memory technology sectors, including semiconductor manufacturers, materials suppliers, memory design and fabrication firms, supply chain participants, and researchers/academic collaborators engaged in memory technology development.
  • Policy implications: Findings could inform future executive actions or legislation related to semiconductor supply chain security, industrial policy, export controls, or federal R&D investment.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Current status: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
  • Introduction: The bill was introduced in the House and has at least two co-sponsors.
  • Next steps: Committee review, potential markup, and floor consideration. If passed, it would move to the Senate (if applicable) or proceed according to Senate procedures for companion or similar bills.

Potential impact and considerations

  • Strategic goal: By studying the advanced memory marketplace, the bill seeks to illuminate vulnerabilities and opportunities in the U.S. memory technology supply chain, guiding policy decisions to enhance competitiveness and security.
  • Data and policy outcomes: The quality and scope of the study will shape any subsequent actions—ranging from targeted investments in domestic production to collaboration with allies or adjustments to research funding and regulatory frameworks.
  • Timing: The usefulness of the study depends on timely completion and how quickly findings can inform ongoing or upcoming policy debates related to semiconductor supply chains and national competitiveness.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to focus on specific sections of the bill once the full text is available or provide a comparative briefing with similar prior studies in memory technology policy.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.