To prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from taking any action to expand the Mid-Continent Limestone Quarry located near Glenwood Springs, Colorado.

119th Congress Introduced by Jeff Hurd

The bill would prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from taking any action to facilitate or advance the expansion of the Mid-Continent Limestone Quarry near Glenwood Springs, Col

Introduced in House

Bill overview

HR 9826, introduced in the 119th Congress, seeks to prohibit the Secretary of the Interior from taking any action to expand the Mid-Continent Limestone Quarry located near Glenwood Springs, Colorado. The measure has been referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources and has at least one co-sponsor (Jeff Hurd).

Purpose and intent

The core objective is to halt or block any Interior Department actions aimed at expanding the Mid-Continent Limestone Quarry near Glenwood Springs, Colorado.

The bill appears to target external actions within Interior’s purview that could advance expansion plans, requiring the Secretary to refrain from pursuing expansion-related activities.

Key provisions and changes (anticipated based on the bill’s title)

Prohibition on action: The Secretary of the Interior is barred from taking any official action that would facilitate or advance the expansion of the Mid-Continent Limestone Quarry in the specified Colorado location.

Scope of action: The restriction is limited to actions connected to the quarry expansion and does not explicitly mention other Department of the Interior programs or unrelated activities.

Enforcement/implementation: The bill does not currently detail enforcement mechanisms, penalties, or a reporting requirement within the provided summary. Such details, if included in the full text, would specify how compliance is determined and what remedies apply for violations.

Who/what would be affected

Federal agency: The Department of the Interior, specifically actions related to the expansion project of the Mid-Continent Limestone Quarry near Glenwood Springs, Colorado.

Quarry project stakeholders: Potential developers, operators, or partners involved in expansion plans may be constrained by any Interior actions the bill seeks to prevent.

Local and regional impacts: Any anticipated economic, environmental, or land-use effects tied to quarry expansion could be impacted by the legislative barrier, depending on broader policy and enforcement.

Procedural and timeline aspects

Introduction: The bill was introduced in the House and assigned to the Committee on Natural Resources on July 22, 2026.

Action history: The same day, it was referred to the committee, indicating the bill’s progression into the committee review stage.

Next steps: If advanced by the committee, the bill would move to the full House for consideration, and potentially to the Senate and then to the president for signature, subject to legislative approval and potential amendments.

Notes and considerations

Specifics such as dollar amounts, permit requirements, environmental safeguards, or the exact legal mechanisms (e.g., amendments to existing statutes, new prohibitions) are not detailed in the provided information. The full text would clarify enforcement, exceptions, and any timelines.

As presented, the bill establishes a straightforward prohibition on Interior actions related to quarry expansion, without indicating a broader policy agenda on mining, land use, or local governance beyond this particular project.