WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 9370

Protect Local Funding Act

119th Congress Introduced by Suzanne Bonamici and 28 co-sponsors

The bill would bar finalizing, implementing, or enforcing any proposed rule related to Federal financial assistance.

Introduced in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 9370

Overview

HR 9370 is a bill introduced in the 119th Congress that would prohibit the finalization, implementation, or enforcement of a proposed rule that involves Federal financial assistance, along with related purposes. The measure appears to seek a halt on agency actions related to proposed rulemakings that pertain to the administration of federal financial support programs, pending further legislative action or review.

Purpose and intent

  • Primary aim: To block or pause the finalization, implementation, or enforcement of a proposed rule concerning Federal financial assistance.
  • The bill’s wording suggests a broader moratorium or prohibition on regulatory actions tied to a proposed rule that would affect federal financial assistance programs or the conditions under which such assistance is provided.

Key provisions and changes

  • Prohibition on finalization: The bill would prevent agencies from issuing a final rule that derives from a proposed rule related to Federal financial assistance.
  • Prohibition on implementation and enforcement: It would also bar the implementation and enforcement of any such proposed rule that is associated with federal financial assistance.
  • Scope: The measure appears to cover proposed rules at federal agencies that govern, alter, or influence federal financial assistance programs (e.g., grants, loans, subsidies, or other federal support mechanisms).
  • Mechanism: While the exact procedural details are not provided in the summary, typical provisions would authorize the legislative branch to intervene or require agencies to halt actions pending further review or until specified conditions are met.

Affected parties and entities

  • Federal agencies proposing or promulgating rules related to Federal financial assistance.
  • Recipients and administrators of federal financial assistance programs (e.g., states, local governments, nonprofit organizations, institutions of higher education, and individuals who rely on federal aid).
  • Potentially, entities involved in rulemaking, compliance, and enforcement activities within relevant departments (e.g., Education, Housing, Health and Human Services, Agriculture, and others administering grants and subsidies).

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Referral: The bill was referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform (as of June 18, 2026).
  • Introduction: The bill was introduced in the House on the same date.
  • Schedule: No specific timelines or sunset provisions are provided in the summary; further detail would be in the bill text (e.g., effectiveness dates, rulemaking pause duration, or conditions for lifting the prohibition).

Sponsors and support

  • Primary sponsorship includes a broad group of Democrats, reflecting a cross-cutting coalition.
  • Notable co-sponsors: Gwen Moore, Chrissy Houlahan, Chris Deluzio, Dan Goldman, Mary Gay Scanlon, Haley Stevens, Greg Landsman, Josh Riley, Sarah McBride, Eleanor Holmes Norton, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Seth Moulton, Emanuel Cleaver, Suzanne Bonamici, Bill Foster, Debbie Dingell, Mike Quigley, Jared Huffman, April McClain Delaney, Melanie Stansbury, Nikki Budzinski, among others.
  • The listed co-sponsors suggest the bill has support from members with interests in federal education and research funding, housing and urban development, health programs, and consumer protection.

Potential impact and considerations

  • Regulatory pause: If enacted, the bill could slow or stop regulatory changes tied to federal financial assistance, potentially preserving existing program structures and funding conditions while broader policy debates occur.
  • Administrative effects: Agencies would need to halt final rule actions related to Federal financial assistance, which could affect grant-making policies, eligibility criteria, reporting requirements, and compliance frameworks.
  • Stakeholder impact: Recipients and administrators of federal funding might face interim uncertainty, changes in eligibility, or postponed reforms while the prohibition is in effect.
  • Oversight and accountability: The bill underscores legislative supervision over agency rulemaking in areas tied to federal support, potentially enhancing congressional involvement in rule development for funded programs.

Note

  • For a precise understanding of scope, limitations, enforcement mechanisms, and any exceptions, the full text of HR 9370 would be needed, along with any associated fiscal impact statements, cost assessments, and committee reports.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.