WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 8016

Forever Chemical Regulation and Accountability Act of 2026

119th Congress Introduced by Raja Krishnamoorthi and 3 co-sponsors

Bill phases out nonessential PFAS production and prohibits environmental releases, restricting persistent "forever chemicals" linked to water contamination and health risks across multiple industries.

Referred to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment.
2
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 8016

Legislative bill overview

HR 8016 proposes phasing out the production of nonessential perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)—synthetic chemicals resistant to heat, water, and oil—and prohibiting their environmental releases. PFAS are widely used in products like non-stick cookware, food packaging, textiles, and firefighting foams. The bill aims to comprehensively restrict these "forever chemicals" that persist indefinitely in the environment and accumulate in human blood.

Why is this important

PFAS contamination has been detected in drinking water supplies affecting millions of Americans and is linked to health concerns including liver damage, immune system suppression, and increased cholesterol. The chemicals' persistence and bioaccumulation mean once released, they remain in ecosystems and human bodies indefinitely. Current regulations are fragmented; this bill would establish unified federal restrictions on production and release.

Potential points of contention

  • Industry impact: Manufacturing sectors reliant on PFAS (aerospace, military equipment, water-resistant textiles, non-stick cookware) face significant production and reformulation costs; identifying viable alternatives may require years of research and development
  • Definition disputes: The bill's distinction between "essential" and "nonessential" uses may generate intense debate about what qualifies, with different stakeholders (military, medical device makers, manufacturers) proposing competing classifications
  • International competitiveness: Unilateral U.S. restrictions could disadvantage domestic manufacturers against international competitors less constrained by PFAS regulations, potentially pushing production overseas

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.