WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 9323

To establish the Department of Advanced Technology and Artificial Intelligence, and for other purposes.

119th Congress

Creates a cabinet-level DATAI to coordinate federal AI and advanced tech policy, funding, regulation, and workforce development.

Introduced in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 9323

Summary of HR 9323 (Session 119)

Purpose and intent

HR 9323 seeks to establish a new federal department: the Department of Advanced Technology and Artificial Intelligence (DATAI). The bill appears to be focused on consolidating federal capabilities related to advanced technologies, artificial intelligence (AI), and related research and development, with the aim of coordinating policy, regulation, funding, and oversight in these fields. The overarching goal is to enhance national competitiveness, security, innovation, and public service delivery through a centralized department dedicated to AI and other advanced technologies.

Key provisions and changes (anticipated core elements)

  • Establishment of DATAI: Creation of a cabinet-level department to house agencies and offices currently involved in AI, quantum, cybersecurity, robotics, automation, and related tech areas. The department would have its own Secretary and organizational structure.
  • Strategic leadership and coordination: DATAI would set national strategies for advanced technologies, including AI research priorities, deployment standards, workforce development, ethics and safety frameworks, and international engagement.
  • Funding and budgetary authority: The department would have an operating budget and the authority to allocate funds for targeted AI and advanced-tech programs, potentially including grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements with public and private entities.
  • Policy and regulation: DATAI would develop and enforce policies related to the ethical development and deployment of AI, data governance, transparency, accountability, safety testing, and risk management. It could also coordinate with other federal agencies on technology-specific rules.
  • Research and development: Increased federal support for R&D in AI and adjacent technologies, including funding for basic and applied research, testbeds, and public-private partnerships.
  • Workforce and education: Programs to train and reskill the workforce for advanced technologies, including scholarships, fellowships, and collaboration with educational institutions and industry.
  • National security and defense alignment: DATAI may have roles in safeguarding critical infrastructure, protecting AI systems from misuse, and aligning civilian tech development with national security interests.
  • Data governance and privacy considerations: Possible provisions addressing data access, sharing, privacy, and security in the context of federal AI initiatives.
  • Interagency and state collaboration: Mechanisms for coordination with other federal agencies, as well as consultation or collaboration with state and local governments and non-federal partners.

Who would be affected

  • Federal agencies: Existing agencies involved in AI, tech R&D, cybersecurity, and related fields would either transfer into DATAI or align under its leadership and policy direction.
  • Researchers and institutions: Universities, national labs, and private sector partners receiving federal funding for AI and advanced-tech research would engage with DATAI for programs and grants.
  • Workforce and students: Individuals pursuing education and training in AI and related technologies could participate in new DATAI-led programs.
  • Public and private stakeholders: Industries relying on AI and advanced tech, as well as citizens affected by AI deployment standards and safety regulations, would be impacted through policy and program execution.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Action history:
    • Introduced in the House and referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on June 15, 2026.
  • Next steps in the legislative process: The bill would typically move through committee hearings, potential amendments, and votes in the House, followed by consideration in the Senate if passed, before any potential presidential action.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Innovation and competition: A centralized DATAI could streamline funding and reduce fragmentation, potentially accelerating AI and advanced-tech innovation.
  • Regulation and safety: A dedicated department could standardize safety, ethics, and accountability frameworks across federal AI activities.
  • Resource allocation: Creation of a new department would require fiscal resources and could shift funding priorities from existing agencies.
  • Privacy and civil liberties: Data governance provisions would need careful balancing of national interests with privacy protections.

Note: Specific statutory text, funding levels, department structure, and exact authorities are not provided in the summary available here. For a precise understanding, review the bill’s official text, committee reports, and fiscal notes.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.