WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 9479

To establish grounds for revocation of citizenship and immigration status, to review certain asylum and refugee grants, and require repatriation of denaturalized individuals with their children, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced by Nancy Mace and 1 co-sponsor

The bill creates grounds to revoke U.S. citizenship or immigration status, and adds review and repatriation rules for denaturalized individuals and their children.

Introduced in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 9479

Summary of HR 9479 (Session 119)

Purpose and overall aim

HR 9479 seeks to modify U.S. citizenship and immigration policy by:
- Establishing grounds for revocation of citizenship and immigration status.
- Creating procedures to review certain asylum and refugee grants.
- Requiring repatriation of denaturalized individuals along with their children.
- Addressing additional related purposes as indicated by the bill’s language.

The bill is introduced in the House and referred to the Judiciary Committee. It lists two co-sponsors: Rep. Andy Ogles and Rep. Nancy Mace.

Key provisions and changes (highlights)

While the full text would provide precise statutory language, the bill’s stated aims indicate several core provisions:

  1. Grounds for revocation of citizenship and immigration status

    • Establishes specific circumstances under which a person’s U.S. citizenship or non-citizen immigration status could be revoked.
    • Potentially expands or clarifies categories such as fraud in naturalization, misrepresentation, concealed material facts, or other actions deemed undermining of national interest.
    • Likely creates procedural mechanisms to review and adjudicate revocation cases, including standards of proof and evidentiary requirements.

  2. Review of asylum and refugee grants

    • Introduces or enhances processes to review existing asylum and refugee determinations.
    • May set criteria or timelines for re-evaluation, revocation, or termination of asylum/refugee status.
    • Could impact individuals currently granted asylum or refugee protections by enabling more checks or expedited review.

  3. Repatriation of denaturalized individuals with their children

    • Requires or facilitates the return of denaturalized individuals to their country of origin, along with any accompanying minor children.
    • May address custody, child welfare, and legal status considerations for children born in or outside the United States.
    • Likely outlines enforcement mechanisms and potential exceptions or humanitarian safeguards.

  4. Other purposes

    • The bill may include additional provisions related to immigration enforcement, naturalization procedures, and related administrative processes.

Who would be affected

  • Individuals seeking or holding U.S. citizenship or lawful immigration status (including asylees and refugees) could be subject to new grounds for revocation and new review procedures.
  • Denaturalized individuals and their children could face repatriation requirements or processes.
  • Immigration judges, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), and other enforcement and adjudicatory agencies would implement the new standards, procedures, and reviews.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Current action: Introduced in the House and referred to the Judiciary Committee (as of 2026-06-25).
  • Next steps typically involve committee consideration, potential markup, and votes by the full House. If passed, the bill would proceed to the Senate (or undergo reconciliation if there are related measures) and ultimately to the President for signature or veto.
  • The bill’s text would specify effective dates and any transitional provisions, including whether new grounds apply to pending cases or only to prospective actions.

Potential implications and considerations

  • Strengthened emphasis on safeguarding national interests in citizenship and immigration decisions.
  • Increased scrutiny of asylum and refugee grants, with potential implications for applicants and adjudicators.
  • Humanitarian and child welfare considerations in repatriation provisions would require careful handling to avoid detrimental effects on children.

Note: This summary is based on the bill’s stated objectives and sponsor information. For a complete understanding, the full bill text and any related analysis or fiscal notes should be consulted once available.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.