WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 9445

Let Doctors Provide Reproductive Health Care Act

119th Congress Introduced by Ami Bera and 4 co-sponsors

The bill seeks to protect health care providers from legal or regulatory actions when offering reproductive health services, expanding access by preempting restrictive laws.

Introduced in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 9445

Summary of HR 9445 (118th/119th Congress context)

Note: This summary reflects the information provided (title, sponsors, and action history) and outlines the bill’s stated purpose and potential impact based on its title and typical provisions associated with such measures. For precise text and enacted provisions, refer to the official bill language.

Purpose and intent

  • The bill is titled: “To ensure the right to provide reproductive health care services, and for other purposes.”
  • Core objective: protect and promote the ability of health care providers to offer reproductive health care services, potentially safeguarding physicians, clinics, and other entities from legal or regulatory barriers that restrict such care.
  • By focusing on the “right to provide,” the bill aims to reduce or preempt restrictions on providers when offering reproductive health services to patients.

Key provisions and changes (as suggested by the title and common structure of similar bills)

  • Establishes or reinforces protections for health care providers who offer reproductive health care services, which may include:
    • Shielding providers from certain civil or criminal actions arising from providing legally permitted reproductive health care.
    • Limiting state or local laws that inhibit or penalize providers for offering reproductive services, consistent with federal standards.
  • Clarifies scope of services covered, potentially including contraception, abortion, and related counseling or referrals, depending on the bill’s language.
  • Addresses cross-border or interstate aspects to enable providers in one state to deliver services that may be restricted in another state, subject to applicable federal law.
  • May include civil rights or anti-discrimination provisions to prevent harassment or penalization of providers based on the services they offer.
  • Could contain enforcement mechanisms, including coordination with federal agencies or the creation of remedies for providers facing unlawful actions.

Who is affected

  • Health care providers (physicians, nurse practitioners, clinics, hospitals, and other entities) that offer reproductive health care services.
  • Patients seeking reproductive health services may benefit from increased access and protections when receiving care from compliant providers.
  • States and local jurisdictions that regulate health care provision could be affected if the bill preempts or limits restrictions on provider services.
  • Professional medical associations and health care organizations may be engaged in compliance and advocacy activities.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Action history: Introduced in the House on 2026-06-24.
  • Referral: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and, in addition, to the House Committee on the Judiciary, for consideration of provisions within each committee’s jurisdiction.
  • This dual referral suggests the bill encompasses both health care policy provisions and legal/regulatory safeguards, with potential hearings, amendments, and votes in both committees.
  • As with many House bills, floor consideration would follow committee action, with potential further refinements or changes before any Senate consideration and possible enactment.

Potential impacts and considerations

  • Legal/Regulatory Impact: If enacted, the bill could create federal protections for providers and may limit certain state-level restrictions on reproductive health services.
  • Access and Quality of Care: By safeguarding providers, the bill could enhance access to reproductive health services for patients, depending on implementation and accompanying funding or enforcement provisions.
  • Intergovernmental Dynamics: The bill’s reach may intersect with state laws and interstate medical practice, potentially prompting legal challenges or preemption debates.
  • Budget and Resources: Implementation could involve federal agency oversight, compliance activities, and potential funding for enforcement or education.

For a precise understanding, reviewing the full text of HR 9445 and any accompanying committee reports or summaries is recommended.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.