WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SR 9

TO AUTHORIZE THE INTRODUCTION OF A NONAPPROPRIATION BILL TO PROHIBIT THE USE OF A COMPUTER MANUFACTURED BY A COVERED FOREIGN ENTITY IN DIGITAL ASSET MINING AND PROHIBIT THE USE OF CERTAIN SOFTWARE IN DIGITAL ASSET MINING.

2026 Fiscal Session Introduced by Bryan King

Arkansas authorizes a bill banning computers from covered foreign entities and certain software from cryptocurrency mining to address security and economic concerns.

Died in Senate at Sine Die adjournment.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SR 9

Legislative bill overview

SR 9 is a resolution authorizing the introduction of a bill that would ban computers manufactured by designated foreign entities and certain software from being used in digital asset (cryptocurrency) mining operations. The bill aims to restrict mining activities using equipment and tools from countries or manufacturers deemed foreign threats, presumably targeting Chinese-manufactured hardware that dominates the mining industry.

Why is this important

Cryptocurrency mining consumes significant electrical resources and computing power. This bill addresses concerns about economic competitiveness, national security dependencies on foreign hardware manufacturers, and energy consumption concentrated in foreign-controlled supply chains. It reflects growing state-level interest in regulating cryptocurrency infrastructure.

Potential points of contention

  • Definition ambiguity: The bill references "covered foreign entity" without clearly defining which manufacturers or countries qualify, creating uncertainty for enforcement and compliance
  • Economic impact: Crypto mining operations would face substantial compliance costs or relocation, potentially eliminating a revenue source for some Arkansas businesses and affecting equipment retailers
  • Technical feasibility: Distinguishing between foreign-manufactured versus domestically-manufactured mining hardware and monitoring software usage presents significant enforcement challenges
  • Trade law concerns: Restrictions on specific manufacturers' products may conflict with interstate commerce protections or international trade agreements
  • Industry disruption: The ban could displace existing mining operations and deter new investments in Arkansas without clear evidence of security or economic benefits

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.