WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 9102

BINSA Act

119th Congress Introduced by Debbie Dingell and 1 co-sponsor

HR 9102 would redefine what counts as prohibited and notifiable technologies under the Defense Production Act, changing which technologies face government controls and reporting re

Introduced in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 9102

Summary of HR 9102 (119th Congress)

Purpose and intent

HR 9102 proposes amendments to Title VIII of the Defense Production Act of 1950. The core aim is to modify the definitions of two key terms used to identify controlled technologies: “prohibited technology” and “notifiable technology.” By altering these definitions, the bill would influence which technologies are subject to government controls, reporting requirements, and potential federal actions under the Defense Production Act framework.

Key points:
- The bill seeks changes to the criteria used to classify certain technologies for national defense and national security purposes.
- By redefining prohibited and notifiable technologies, the administration and relevant agencies could adjust the scope of technologies that require alignment with priority actions, export controls, or government procurement and cooperation measures.

Key provisions and changes (as proposed)

While the full text is not provided here, the bill’s stated aim indicates the following types of changes would be expected:
- Definition updates: Revisions to the definitions of “prohibited technology” and “notifiable technology” within Title VIII, potentially altering:
- The types of technologies considered critical for defense or national security.
- The threshold criteria (e.g., dual-use characteristics, potential military applicability, strategic importance).
- Regulatory scope and actions: Depending on how definitions are revised, this could affect:
- Which technologies trigger mandatory notifications to federal authorities.
- The range of government actions available under the Defense Production Act (e.g., priority ratings, allocation, loans, or assistance) for entities dealing with these technologies.
- Implementation and oversight: Possible adjustments to processes for designation, review, and enforcement to reflect the updated definitions.

Who/what would be affected

  • Industry sectors: Companies developing, manufacturing, or exporting technologies that may fall under the revised definitions (e.g., advanced manufacturing, electronics, AI, cybersecurity, materials).
  • Federal agencies: Agencies administering the Defense Production Act would implement the updated definitions, determine applicability, and manage compliance, reporting, and any associated authorities.
  • Supply chains and contractors: Firms involved in defense-related supply chains could experience updated requirements for notifications, prioritization, or government coordination.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction and referral: The bill was introduced in the House and referred to the House Committee on Financial Services on June 2, 2026.
  • Sponsorship: Co-sponsors include Rep. Debbie Dingell and Rep. John Moolenaar, indicating bipartisan interest in revising the defense production framework.
  • Next steps: If reported out of committee, the bill would proceed to the broader House for debate and a vote. Amendments or further refinements could occur during committee markup or floor consideration.

Potential impact and considerations

  • The redefinition of prohibited and notifiable technologies could broaden or narrow the set of technologies subject to DPA controls, affecting international trade, export controls, and domestic investment in high-tech sectors.
  • Stakeholders may seek clarity on transitional provisions, effective dates, and guidance for compliance to avoid disruption in research, development, and commercial activities.
  • Implications for national security policy, technology leadership, and resilience in critical supply chains may be central considerations for lawmakers and industry alike.

If you’d like, I can compare HR 9102's proposed definitions to current law or summarize any available committee reports or fiscal notes to provide more detail on anticipated impacts.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.