WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 8686

To amend the Military Land Withdrawals Act of 2013 to withdraw and reserve certain public land in the vicinity of Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona.

119th Congress Introduced by Paul Gosar

The bill would withdraw and reserve public land around Yuma Proving Ground to restrict uses and align land management with military needs.

Subcommittee on Federal Lands Discharged
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 8686

Overview

HR 8686, introduced in the 119th Congress, seeks to amend the Military Land Withdrawals Act of 2013 with respect to land around the Yuma Proving Ground in Arizona. The bill would withdraw and reserve specified public land in the vicinity of the Yuma Proving Ground, potentially altering land use, management, and eligibility for certain federal programs or private development nearby.

Purpose and Intent

  • To modify the current provisions of the Military Land Withdrawals Act of 2013 by withdrawing and reserving additional public land near the Yuma Proving Ground.
  • The aim is to provide protection or controlled use of land in proximity to the military installation, aligning land status with military testing and operations needs.

Key Provisions (as described by the bill’s title and summary)

  • Amend the 2013 Act to withdraw and reserve specific parcels of public land around Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona.
  • Establish a protective status for the withdrawn land, restricting certain activities or vesting authority to manage land uses consistent with military needs.
  • Potentially delineate boundaries, parcels, or coordinates of the land to be withdrawn and reserved (the exact legal descriptions would be contained in the text of the bill and accompanying maps).

Note: The precise mechanisms (e.g., duration of withdrawal, authorities for land management, exceptions, public access rules, and potential compensation or land exchanges) would be specified in the bill’s full text and any related fiscal or regulatory notes. The summary here reflects the general intention to withdraw and reserve land surrounding the Yuma Proving Ground.

Who or What Would Be Affected

  • Land: Public lands near the Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona, targeted for withdrawal and reservation.
  • Jurisdiction: Federal land management under the terms set by the amended Act, with potential involvement of agencies such as the Department of the Interior and the Department of Defense.
  • Stakeholders: Yuma Proving Ground personnel, nearby communities, potential outdoor recreation users, and entities with interests in adjacent federal lands. The change could affect land use planning, access, and potential development or conservation measures around the installation.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • The bill was introduced in the House and referred on May 7, 2026.
  • Referrals: Committee on Natural Resources and the Committee on Armed Services, for consideration of provisions within their jurisdictions.
  • The timeline for committee action, potential amendments, and floor consideration would follow standard House procedures, including possible hearings, markups, and votes, subject to leadership decisions and scheduling.

Potential Implications and Considerations

  • National Security and Military Readiness: The withdrawal and reservation could enhance security and operational control for the Yuma Proving Ground.
  • Public Lands Policy: The action would modify public land status, potentially limiting future use, access, or development in the affected areas.
  • Local Impact: Neighboring communities and recreational users may experience changes in land availability and usage rights.
  • Environmental and Cultural Resources: The withdrawal could impact environmental protections, habitats, and any culturally significant resources within the parcels.

Summary

HR 8686 proposes amending the 2013 Military Land Withdrawals Act to withdraw and reserve certain public land near the Yuma Proving Ground in Arizona. The goal is to better align land management with military needs by restricting or controlling land use in the vicinity. The bill has been referred to the Committee on Natural Resources and the Committee on Armed Services for consideration.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.