WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 351

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 to prohibit congestion or cordon pricing in a value pricing program, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced by Jeff Van Drew and 2 co-sponsors

HR 351 prohibits congestion and cordon pricing in transportation funding, protecting drivers from extra costs while encouraging alternative funding strategies.

Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 351

Summary of HR 351

Bill Overview

Bill Number: HR 351
Title: To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 to prohibit congestion or cordon pricing in a value pricing program, and for other purposes.
Introduced On: January 13, 2025
Current Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit

Purpose and Intent

The primary purpose of HR 351 is to amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) by explicitly prohibiting the establishment or maintenance of value pricing programs that include congestion pricing or cordon pricing. This bill aims to address concerns regarding the financial burden that such pricing mechanisms may impose on drivers and to promote alternative funding strategies for transportation infrastructure.

Key Provisions

  • Amendment to ISTEA: The bill proposes to add a new provision to Section 1012(b) of the ISTEA, stating that:
    • The Secretary of Transportation is prohibited from establishing or maintaining any value pricing program that incorporates:
    • Value Pricing
    • Congestion Pricing
    • Cordon Pricing

This amendment seeks to eliminate the possibility of implementing pricing strategies that charge drivers based on traffic congestion levels or geographic zones.

Affected Parties

  • Drivers and Commuters: The bill is likely to impact individual drivers and commuters who may otherwise be subject to congestion or cordon pricing in urban areas.
  • Transportation Agencies: State and local transportation agencies that might have considered implementing such pricing strategies will be directly affected by this prohibition.
  • Policy Makers: The bill may influence the approach of policymakers regarding funding transportation infrastructure and managing traffic congestion.

Procedural Aspects

  • Legislative Timeline:
    • January 13, 2025: HR 351 was introduced in the House and referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
    • January 14, 2025: The bill was referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit for further consideration.

Conclusion

HR 351 seeks to amend existing transportation legislation by prohibiting specific pricing strategies aimed at managing traffic congestion. By doing so, it aims to protect drivers from additional financial burdens associated with congestion and cordon pricing, while also prompting discussions on alternative funding mechanisms for transportation infrastructure. The bill is currently under review by the relevant subcommittee, and its future will depend on further legislative actions.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.