WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 9882

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to provide for requirements relating to documentation for major acquisition programs, and for other purposes.

119th Congress Introduced by Shri Thanedar and 1 co-sponsor

The bill would require standardized, ongoing documentation for DHS major acquisition programs to improve oversight, transparency, and accountability.

Introduced in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 9882

Overview

HR 9882, introduced in the 119th Congress and referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security, aims to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to establish requirements relating to documentation for major acquisition programs and related purposes. The bill has at least two co-sponsors: Bennie Thompson and Shri Thanedar.

Purpose and intent

  • To modify the Homeland Security Act of 2002 by adding documentation-related requirements for major acquisition programs undertaken by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) or related federal entities.
  • The core aim appears to be enhancing oversight, transparency, and accountability in the procurement and management of large, high-value DHS acquisition programs through standardized documentation.

Key provisions and changes (as implied by the title and standard DHS acquisition reform approaches)

  • Documentation Requirements: Establish specific documentation standards or mandates for major acquisition programs. This could include requirements such as:
    • Comprehensive program baselines (cost, schedule, performance).
    • Regular maintenance of up-to-date program documentation (plans, milestones, risk registers).
    • Documentation for decisions, changes, and approvals at key milestones.
  • Oversight and Accountability: Strengthen congressional or departmental oversight through documented evidence of program justification, alignment with mission needs, and compliance with procurement rules.
  • Consistency Across Programs: Apply uniform documentation standards to all major acquisition programs to reduce inconsistency and improve comparability.

Note: The exact text of provisions is not provided, so the above reflects typical elements associated with documentation-focused amendments to major acquisition authorities.

Who/what would be affected

  • Primarily major acquisition programs within DHS or related homeland security entities that fall under the Homeland Security Act framework.
  • DHS program managers, contracting officers, and program offices responsible for planning, executing, and reporting on major acquisitions.
  • Oversight bodies (e.g., DHS leadership, inspector general, and possibly congressional committees) that rely on standardized documentation for review.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • Introduction and Referral: Bill introduced and referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security on July 22, 2026.
  • Next steps in committee: The committee would review, possibly amend, and vote on whether to report the bill to the full House.
  • Potential timelines: If reported, the bill would move through subsequent House consideration and, if passed, would proceed to the Senate (and potentially to conference if differences arise) before any final enactment.

Potential impact and considerations

  • Improved transparency: Standardized documentation could improve visibility into program baselines, risks, and decision points.
  • Enhanced accountability: Clear records may facilitate oversight and auditability of major DHS acquisitions.
  • Compliance burden: Agencies may face added documentation requirements and administrative workload, particularly for programs with complex governance structures.
  • Budget and scheduling effects: Depending on the exact requirements, there could be implications for program timelines and budgeting processes due to more rigorous documentation cadence.

Notes

  • This summary is based on the bill’s title and sponsorship information. Access to the full text would provide precise language, specific documentation standards, thresholds for what constitutes a “major acquisition program,” and any definitional provisions that shape applicability and enforcement.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.