WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HR 9116

Equal Remedies Act of 2026

119th Congress Introduced by Suzanne Bonamici and 3 co-sponsors

The bill would align remedies for age discrimination with those for Title VII, expanding and equalizing legal and equitable relief available in age-discrimination cases.

Introduced in House
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HR 9116

Summary of HR 9116 (119th Congress)

Purpose and intent

  • HR 9116 seeks to harmonize remedies available under two federal statutes:
    • Equalize the remedies under section 1977A of the Revised Statutes of 1977 (which governs actions related to certain civil rights protections, including remedies for discrimination in places of public accommodation and related contexts historically tied to the Civil Rights Act).
    • Amend the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) to provide any legal or equitable relief available under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In short, the bill aims to ensure parity between remedies available for age discrimination and those available for sex/race/etc. discrimination under civil rights law.

Key provisions (provisions described by the bill)

  • Equalize remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1977A (historic statute governing certain civil rights remedies) with remedies available under the ADEA, ensuring that actions or penalties available for age discrimination have similar reach or equivalence to other civil rights remedies.
  • Extend or align the scope of legal or equitable relief under the ADEA with the relief generally available under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This could involve:
    • Expanding available remedies (e.g., back pay, front pay, compensatory and punitive damages where permitted, injunctive relief, reinstatement, front-line protections) to align with those provided under Title VII.
    • Potentially clarifying procedural pathways or criteria for obtaining such relief in cases involving age discrimination, ensuring comparability to Title VII enforcement.
  • The text implies a broader aim to remove discrepancies between remedies for age discrimination and other civil rights protections in the workplace and related contexts.

Who would be affected

  • Individuals alleging age discrimination in employment would potentially gain access to a fuller set of legal or equitable relief options, aligned with those available for sex, race, or other protected characteristics under Title VII.
  • Employers and organizations subject to anti-discrimination laws could face expanded remedies in age discrimination cases, potentially increasing exposure to damages or injunctive relief comparable to other protected classes.
  • Federal agencies and courts implementing civil rights enforcement could experience changes in how remedies are applied or awarded in age discrimination claims.

Procedural and timeline aspects

  • The bill was introduced in the House and referred to:
    • Committee on Education and the Workforce
    • Committee on the Judiciary
  • Referred for consideration of provisions falling within the jurisdiction of each committee, with the exact timing to be determined by the Speaker.
  • Co-sponsors include Eleanor Holmes Norton, Pramila Jayapal, Suzanne Bonamici, and Bobby Scott, indicating bipartisan and bicameral interest in strengthening civil rights remedies related to age discrimination.

Key considerations and potential impacts

  • Equalizing remedies could lead to broader liability for employers in age discrimination cases, such as availability of more expansive compensatory damages or equitable relief where not previously accessible.
  • The alignment with Title VII remedies may prompt changes in legal strategy, complaint filing, and settlement dynamics in age discrimination cases.
  • Implementation details (e.g., caps on damages, proof standards, or procedural timelines) would be clarified in the bill’s text and any accompanying amendments or regulations.

If you’d like, I can tailor this summary to specific audiences (policy-makers, employers, or general readers) or extract potential pros and cons once the bill’s full text and any committee reports are available.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.