No TAP Act of 2026

HR 8349 (119th Congress) — Summary

Overview
- Title: To amend section 133 of title 23, United States Code, to remove a certain State funding set-aside for transportation alternative programs, and for other purposes.
- Purpose (general intent): Modify federal transportation funding rules by eliminating a state-level set-aside related to Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) funding in section 133 of title 23, United States Code. The bill affects how certain funds allocated for transportation alternatives are distributed within states and to eligible projects.
- Status: Introduced in the House and referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure (April 16, 2026). Co-sponsor: Rep. Scott Perry.

Key Provisions (as described by the bill’s title and typical TAP-related adjustments)
- Core change: Remove a specific state funding set-aside within the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) under 23 U.S.C. 133.
- Implication: Adjusts or eliminates a dedicated percentage or minimum allocation that a state must use for TAP projects from the federal funds apportioned for transportation alternatives.
- Scope: Applies to the transportation funding program established under 23 U.S.C. 133 (which governs funding for federal-aid highways and related programs), specifically to the TAP portion.
- “For other purposes” language: Indicates additional or ancillary adjustments related to TAP funding, which could include related administrative provisions, reporting requirements, or alignment with other HUD/transportation guidelines as determined by the bill or its amendments.

Who Would Be Affected
- State Departments of Transportation (DOTs) and state-level transportation agencies: Primary implementers of TAP funding and related set-asides; changes could alter the share or treatment of TAP funds within a state’s federal-aid highway program.
- Local governments and eligible TAP project sponsors: Recipients of TAP funds (e.g., pedestrian/ bicycle facilities, safety improvements, community recreation, and projects that improve mobility and accessibility) could experience changes in funding availability or allocation rules.
- Federal and regional planning bodies: Potentially affected by shifts in funding distribution, project eligibility, or administrative processes associated with TAP.

Potential Impact and Considerations
- Funding allocation: If the set-aside is removed, states may have more flexibility in how TAP funds are used or may face a different minimum/maximum allocation structure. The actual impact depends on the precise language of the provision and any accompanying regulatory guidance.
- Project eligibility and timing: Changes could influence which projects are prioritized or how quickly TAP-funded projects can proceed, depending on how funds are reallocated or reprogrammed.
- Administrative burden: Any changes to set-asides may require state DOTs to adjust budgeting, reporting, and compliance processes.

Procedural and Timeline Notes
- Introduction: 2026-04-16
- Referral: House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure (same date)
- Next steps: Committee consideration, potential marks up, and eventual floor action or further legislative referrals. If enacted, the effective date would be determined by the bill’s text (e.g., a future date or upon enactment) and any transitional provisions.

Important caveat
- The summary above is based on the bill’s title and action history. The exact operative language of the bill (the specific statutory amendments) would clarify the precise percentage, set-aside details, transition provisions, and any additional changes. For a complete understanding, consult the full bill text, any committee report, and subsequent floor amendments.