WeVote

Bill

Bill

HB 122

Teacher Excellence and Accountability for Mathematics and Science (TEAMS) Salary Schedule Program; participating teacher with over 20 years of advanced contract criteria service may be offered contract for up to five years instead of required offer of five years

2026 Regular Session Introduced by Terri Collins

Alabama HB 122 allows districts to offer math/science teachers with 20+ years service contracts up to five years instead of mandating five-year contracts, providing flexibility in long-term educator retention strategies.

Enacted
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 122

Legislative bill overview

HB 122 modifies Alabama's TEAMS salary schedule program to allow school districts to offer multi-year contracts of up to five years (rather than requiring exactly five years) to experienced mathematics and science teachers with over 20 years of service on advanced contracts. The bill provides districts with contractual flexibility for their most veteran STEM educators.

Why is this important

Teacher retention and compensation in STEM fields significantly impact student achievement and workforce pipeline development. This flexibility allows districts to tailor retention strategies for experienced teachers while potentially managing budget constraints or performance accountability measures differently for long-tenured versus newer staff.

Potential points of contention

  • Contract security erosion: Changing from "required five-year offer" to "up to five years" could reduce job security guarantees for veteran teachers, potentially disadvantaging those nearing retirement who rely on extended contract predictability
  • Compensation equity: The differential treatment of 20+ year veterans versus other experienced teachers raises questions about whether this creates unfair tiered systems or allows selective contract terms based on subjective criteria
  • Accountability mechanisms: The bill doesn't clarify what criteria determine whether a veteran teacher receives 1-5 years, potentially opening doors to inconsistent application or perceived favoritism in contract negotiations

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.