Support amendment: abolish corporate personhood, money as speech
Ohio resolution proposes constitutional amendment eliminating corporate legal personhood and rejecting money-as-speech doctrine to restrict corporate political spending power.
Ohio resolution proposes constitutional amendment eliminating corporate legal personhood and rejecting money-as-speech doctrine to restrict corporate political spending power.
Senate Resolution 93 proposes a constitutional amendment to abolish the legal doctrine of "corporate personhood"—the principle that corporations possess certain constitutional rights like natural persons—and to reject the classification of money as protected speech. The resolution seeks to overturn or limit the effects of Supreme Court decisions like Citizens United v. FEC that have expanded corporate political spending rights.
This addresses a core debate about campaign finance and political influence. Supporters argue unlimited corporate spending distorts democracy by giving wealthy entities disproportionate political power. Opponents contend that restricting corporate speech raises First Amendment concerns and that the real issue is transparency rather than spending limits.
Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.
Sign in to ask a question.