WeVote
Log In

Bill

WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HF 1821

Bill Summary – HF 1821 (2025-2026), Minnesota

Title

Supplemental nonprofit security grants funding provided, and money appropriated.

Purpose and Intent

HF 1821 is designed to provide additional state funding to support security grants for nonprofit organizations. The bill aims to enhance safety and resilience for nonprofits that may be targeted or at risk of security incidents, such as hate crimes, terrorism, or other violent acts. By increasing the pool of grant money and/or expanding eligibility/uses, the measure seeks to strengthen protective measures for organizations frequently serving the public or vulnerable communities.

Key Provisions and Changes

Note: The bill text is not provided here. The following summarizes common elements typically associated with “supplemental nonprofit security grants” bills and the information available from the bill header and session action. If enacted, specifics such as funding amounts, eligible recipients, and approved security measures would be defined in the final language.

  • Funding and Appropriation

    • Increases the total amount of state funds available for nonprofit security grants.
    • Specifies appropriation source and duration (e.g., one-time vs. recurring appropriations, fiscal years).

  • Eligibility and Recipients

    • Targets nonprofit organizations (potentially including houses of worship, community centers, charities, and other nonprofits that may be at elevated risk).
    • May adjust eligibility criteria (e.g., size, location, prior security needs, or past incidents) and allow partnerships or consortiums.
    • Possible prioritization for organizations serving high-risk or underserved communities.

  • Uses of Funds

    • Approved expenditures could include physical security enhancements (surveillance, lighting, barriers, secure entry systems), security staffing, training, threat assessment, and emergency communication systems.
    • May include costs related to cyber-security or operational security as applicable to nonprofit operations.

  • Application Process and Oversight

    • Establishes application window, required documentation, and submission deadlines.
    • Creates or references a grant review process (criteria, scoring, timelines) and responsible body (likely a state agency or department overseeing public safety or charitable grants).
    • Outlines reporting requirements to demonstrate grant use and outcomes, and potential audit or monitoring provisions.

  • Matching or Local Collaboration (if included)

    • Some grants require a local match or collaboration with local law enforcement, safety partners, or community organizations.

  • Limitations and Accountability

    • Caps on grant amounts per recipient or per year.
    • Provisions to prevent duplication with other federal/state grants.
    • Sunset or review provisions to assess effectiveness and continuation.

Who Would Be Affected

  • Primary Beneficiaries: Minnesota nonprofit organizations seeking funding to upgrade security infrastructure and programs.
  • State Agencies Involved: A state department or agency responsible for administering public safety or nonprofit grants would oversee eligibility determinations, funding disbursement, and reporting.
  • Local Partners: Potential collaboration with local law enforcement, security professionals, or community partners as part of implementation.
  • Public/Community Impact: Enhanced safety for staff, volunteers, clients, congregants, and service users; potential deterrence of targeted wrongdoing.

Procedural and Timeline Aspects

  • Current Status: Introduced and referred to Public Safety Finance and Policy (as of early March 2025).
  • Key Dates in Action History:
    • March 3, 2025: Introduction and first reading; referred to Public Safety Finance and Policy.
    • March 20, 2025: Authors expanded to include additional sponsors.
    • March 24, 2025: Robbins added as author.
  • Next Steps: If advanced, the bill would proceed through committee hearings, potential amendments, floor debate, and votes in the Minnesota House. After House passage, accompanying actions in the Senate and final conference would determine enactment, with any effective dates tied to the appropriations language.

Notes and Considerations

  • The summary above reflects typical features of supplemental nonprofit security grant proposals and the limited information provided. Access to the bill’s full text would clarify exact funding amounts, eligible organizations, approved security measures, match requirements, reporting duties, and specific program administration details.
  • The bill’s impact depends on the final appropriations level and the defined priority groups within the grant program.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.