WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

SB 913

State Universities - As introduced, expands the list of those who are prohibited from serving on a state university board to include those who hold the position of a member of a governing body for another institution of higher education, not just public institutions of higher education. - Amends TCA Title 4, Chapter 29; Title 49, Chapter 7; Title 49, Chapter 8 and Title 49, Chapter 9.

114th Regular Session (2025-2026) Introduced by Adam Lowe

Tennessee bill prohibits state university board members from simultaneously serving on any other higher education institution's governing board, expanding prior restrictions that only covered public universities.

Passed on Second Consideration, refer to Senate Education Committee
#stateuniversities
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · SB 913

Legislative bill overview

SB 913 expands conflict-of-interest restrictions for Tennessee state university board members by prohibiting simultaneous service on boards of any higher education institutions, not just other public universities. Previously, the restriction only applied to public institutions; this bill extends it to include private colleges, community colleges, and other types of higher education governing bodies.

Why is this important

University board positions significantly influence institutional policies, budgets, and strategic direction. Preventing board members from serving multiple institutions simultaneously reduces conflicts of interest and ensures decision-makers prioritize their primary institution's interests. This protects institutional autonomy and prevents cross-institutional influence that could disadvantage competing schools.

Potential points of contention

  • Impact on board recruitment: Restricting board service may limit the pool of qualified candidates, particularly in areas with multiple higher education institutions, potentially making it harder to fill positions with experienced leaders
  • Private vs. public institution balance: The expansion to private institutions may be seen as excessive government overreach or as appropriately protecting public universities from private sector influences depending on one's perspective
  • Definition ambiguity: The bill's scope depends on how "member of a governing body for another institution of higher education" is defined and applied—unclear whether adjunct roles, foundation boards, or advisory positions are included

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.