WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 1447

State forest areas restricted from logging.

2025 Regular Session Introduced by Robb Greene and 3 co-sponsors

HB 1447 restricts logging in Indiana state forests, affecting timber revenue and industry operations while prioritizing conservation over commercial harvesting.

Representative Pierce M added as coauthor
#agencies;departmentofnaturalresources(dnr) #counties;brown #counties;clark #counties;crawford #counties;dubois #counties;harrison #counties;huntington #counties;jackson #counties;jennings #counties;martin #counties;miami #counties;monroe #counties;morgan #counties;owen #counties;sullivan #counties;washington #countygovernment #firefighters;firedepartmentsanddistricts #naturalresources;fishandwildlife #naturalresources;forestsandforestry
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 1447

Legislative bill overview

HB 1447 would restrict logging activities in designated state forest areas in Indiana. The bill was introduced in January 2025 and is currently under review by the Committee on Natural Resources. It has bipartisan support with four cosponsors.

Why is this important

State forests generate revenue through timber sales and logging operations, so restricting these activities would affect state budgets, timber industry workers, and forest management practices. The policy also reflects growing debate over balancing economic use of public lands with conservation and environmental protection goals.

Potential points of contention

  • Revenue impact: State forests contribute income through timber harvesting; restrictions could reduce funding for forest maintenance and other state programs
  • Industry effects: Logging restrictions may impact timber companies, contractors, and workers dependent on state forest harvesting contracts
  • Forest management philosophy: Disagreement over whether restricted logging or active timber management better serves forest health, wildlife habitat, and fire prevention
  • Land use priorities: Conflicting values between preservation/recreation advocates and those prioritizing economic extraction from public lands

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.