WeVote
Log In

Bill

Bill

HB 2750

SNAP E&T PGRAM-PUBLIC COLLEGE

104th Regular Session Introduced by Dee Avelar and 20 co-sponsors

HB 2750 expands SNAP E&T by counting public college programs as eligible E&T, exempting more public-college students from SNAP student rules, pending federal approvals.

Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Tracy Katz Muhl
0
WeVote Research Nonpartisan
Bill Summary · HB 2750

Summary — HB 2750 (Illinois) — SNAP Employment & Training (E&T): Public College Programs

Status: Introduced Feb 2025; passed both chambers and transmitted for signature; takes effect upon becoming law (effective immediately upon enactment).
Primary sponsor: Rep. Barbara Hernandez; multiple cosponsors.

Purpose / Intent

HB 2750 expands and clarifies which postsecondary education programs may count as acceptable components of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Employment & Training (E&T) program for the purpose of exempting certain college students from SNAP student eligibility restrictions. The bill aims to increase access to SNAP for students by treating eligible public higher‑education programs as SNAP E&T components, unless federal law prohibits.

Key provisions

  • Amends Section 12‑4.13b of the Illinois Public Aid Code.
  • Declares that, for purposes of specified federal SNAP regulations (7 C.F.R. § 273.5 and § 273.7):
    • Career and technical programs at community colleges (approved by the Illinois Community College Board and identified by DHS) may be considered E&T components (ref: 7 C.F.R. § 273.5(b)(11)(ii) / § 273.7).
    • Any program of study at a public institution of higher education that improves employability shall be considered an acceptable and equivalent E&T component (ref: 7 C.F.R. § 273.5(b)(11)(iv) and § 273.7(e)), unless prohibited by federal law.
  • Defines “public institution of higher education” by reference to the Board of Higher Education Act.
  • Directs the Department of Human Services (DHS), in consultation with the Illinois Community College Board, Illinois Student Assistance Commission, workforce agencies, advocates and recipients, to:
    • Establish a protocol to identify and verify potential federal exemptions to SNAP student eligibility rules.
    • Seek and obtain any required federal approvals (e.g., USDA Food and Nutrition Service) before publishing related guidance or regulation.
  • Requires DHS to adopt any rules necessary to implement the bill but specifies that rulemaking shall not delay full implementation.
  • Clarifies limitations:
    • The bill does not require DHS to provide particular E&T services (e.g., support services, workers’ compensation, or specific program components).
    • It does not mandate use of federal funds for SNAP E&T financing.
    • It does not obligate institutions of higher education to verify SNAP eligibility.

Who is affected

  • SNAP‑eligible college students enrolled in public institutions (community colleges, state universities) — potentially more students may qualify for student exemptions tied to participation in E&T‑equivalent programs.
  • Public institutions of higher education and community colleges (as providers/partners).
  • Illinois Department of Human Services — administrative and rulemaking responsibilities; must consult stakeholders and pursue federal approvals.
  • Workforce and student aid agencies involved in program identification and coordination.

Procedural / timeline notes

  • The bill requires DHS to adopt implementing rules but explicitly prevents rulemaking from delaying implementation.
  • Where federal approval is required for specific exemption designations, DHS must seek that approval before issuing guidance.
  • Effective date: upon becoming law (immediate).

Potential impacts

  • May increase SNAP access for students participating in qualifying public postsecondary programs by simplifying their classification as E&T participants.
  • Could require administrative changes and coordination among DHS, higher‑education bodies, and workforce partners; may also require federal (USDA/FNS) approvals for some exemptions.
  • Fiscal impact is not specified in the bill text; effects depend on uptake and DHS administrative costs.

Compiled from official sources — confirm details with the bill’s official record.

Sign in to ask a question.